CHKIF
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.08 (-15.69%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.21B
ELALF
Price
$3.99
Change
-$1.00 (-20.04%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHKIF vs ELALF

Header iconCHKIF vs ELALF Comparison
Open Charts CHKIF vs ELALFBanner chart's image
China Southern Airlines
Price$0.43
Change-$0.08 (-15.69%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization13.21B
EL AL Israel Airlines
Price$3.99
Change-$1.00 (-20.04%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization2.27B
CHKIF vs ELALF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHKIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ELALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHKIF vs. ELALF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHKIF is a Hold and ELALF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CHKIF: $0.43 vs. ELALF: $3.99)
Brand notoriety: CHKIF and ELALF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHKIF: 13% vs. ELALF: 124%
Market capitalization -- CHKIF: $13.21B vs. ELALF: $2.27B
CHKIF [@Airlines] is valued at $13.21B. ELALF’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $2.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $39.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $7.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHKIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileELALF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHKIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ELALF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELALF is a better buy in the long-term than CHKIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHKIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ELALF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHKIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ELALF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHKIF is a better buy in the short-term than ELALF.

Price Growth

CHKIF (@Airlines) experienced а -14.71% price change this week, while ELALF (@Airlines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (-1.07% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHKIF($13.2B) has a higher market cap than ELALF($2.27B). ELALF YTD gains are higher at: 77.333 vs. CHKIF (-21.000). CHKIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.4B vs. ELALF (1.07B). CHKIF has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. ELALF (1.64B). ELALF has less debt than CHKIF: ELALF (1.45B) vs CHKIF (203B). CHKIF has higher revenues than ELALF: CHKIF (173B) vs ELALF (3.47B).
CHKIFELALFCHKIF / ELALF
Capitalization13.2B2.27B582%
EBITDA2.4B1.07B225%
Gain YTD-21.00077.333-27%
P/E RatioN/A4.26-
Revenue173B3.47B4,988%
Total Cash16.4B1.64B1,003%
Total Debt203B1.45B13,961%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHKIF vs ELALF: Fundamental Ratings
CHKIF
ELALF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9590
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
9411
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
858
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a24

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHKIF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as ELALF (94). This means that CHKIF’s stock grew similarly to ELALF’s over the last 12 months.

ELALF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHKIF (100). This means that ELALF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHKIF’s over the last 12 months.

ELALF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHKIF (94). This means that ELALF’s stock grew significantly faster than CHKIF’s over the last 12 months.

ELALF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKIF (63). This means that ELALF’s stock grew similarly to CHKIF’s over the last 12 months.

ELALF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHKIF (85). This means that ELALF’s stock grew significantly faster than CHKIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHKIFELALF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
71%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHKIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ELALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMLL22.230.32
+1.48%
Harbor Active Small Cap ETF
XMMO133.241.87
+1.42%
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
SOXQ44.650.57
+1.29%
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
IBII26.400.07
+0.25%
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term Tips ETF
PZT21.490.03
+0.16%
Invesco New York AMT-Free Muni Bd ETF

CHKIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHKIF and EJTTF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHKIF and EJTTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHKIF
1D Price
Change %
CHKIF100%
N/A
EJTTF - CHKIF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLAKF - CHKIF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.86%
DLAKY - CHKIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
EIFZF - CHKIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELALF - CHKIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ELALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELALF and AGZNF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELALF and AGZNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELALF
1D Price
Change %
ELALF100%
N/A
AGZNF - ELALF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLAKY - ELALF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
ESYJY - ELALF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
CHKIF - ELALF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EJTTF - ELALF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More