Ad is loading...
CHKLX vs MCDFX
CHKLX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts CHKLX vs MCDFX
BlackRock China A Opportunities K
Price$12.42
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.87M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.19
Change+$0.08 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
CHKLX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHKLX vs. MCDFX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHKLX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. CHKLX (14.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than CHKLX: MCDFX (3.57) vs CHKLX (2.09). CHKLX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: CHKLX (6 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). CHKLX (3.02) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). CHKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHKLX: MCDFX (2500) vs CHKLX (5000000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.93 vs. CHKLX (5.34). CHKLX return over 5 years is better than : 8.27 vs. MCDFX (-4.22).
| CHKLX | MCDFX | CHKLX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.17 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.02 | 1.17 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.167 | 3.218 | -129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.9M | 93.9M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 3.57 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 24.93 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.11 | -8.22 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.27 | -4.22 | -196% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -0.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...