Ad is loading...
CHKLX vs MCDFX
CHKLX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts CHKLX vs MCDFX
BlackRock China A Opportunities K
Price$13.34
Change+$0.31 (+2.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.69M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.21
Change+$0.36 (+2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
CHKLX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHKLX vs. MCDFX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHKLX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. CHKLX (15.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than CHKLX: MCDFX (3.72) vs CHKLX (2.20). CHKLX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: CHKLX (6 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). CHKLX (3.02) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). CHKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHKLX: MCDFX (2500) vs CHKLX (5000000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.36 vs. CHKLX (5.77). CHKLX return over 5 years is better than : 9.82 vs. MCDFX (-2.81).
| CHKLX | MCDFX | CHKLX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.32 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.02 | 1.32 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.540 | 8.806 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.7M | 93.9M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 3.72 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.77 | 15.36 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.43 | 5.09 | -87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.82 | -2.81 | -350% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 0.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...