Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHKLX vs TRCLX
CHKLX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts CHKLX vs TRCLX
BlackRock China A Opportunities K
Price$14.35
Change-$0.07 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.41M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.18M
CHKLX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 53.2M vs. CHKLX (17.4M). CHKLX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: CHKLX (2.06) vs TRCLX (1.61). CHKLX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: CHKLX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). CHKLX (3.02) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). CHKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHKLX: TRCLX (500000) vs CHKLX (5000000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.82 vs. CHKLX (29.06). CHKLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.91 vs. TRCLX (-2.09).
| CHKLX | TRCLX | CHKLX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.03 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.02 | 2.10 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.265 | 17.424 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 500000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.4M | 53.2M | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 1.61 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.06 | 30.82 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.99 | 4.27 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.91 | -2.09 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement