Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHKLX vs TRCLX
CHKLX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts CHKLX vs TRCLX
BlackRock China A Opportunities K
Price$15.66
Change+$0.17 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.5M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.81
Change+$0.09 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.64M
CHKLX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHKLX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHKLX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.6M vs. CHKLX (20.5M). CHKLX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: CHKLX (1.74) vs TRCLX (1.34). CHKLX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: CHKLX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). CHKLX (3.02) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). CHKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHKLX: TRCLX (500000) vs CHKLX (5000000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.16 vs. CHKLX (18.63). CHKLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.66 vs. TRCLX (-3.01).
| CHKLX | TRCLX | CHKLX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.03 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.02 | 2.10 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.833 | 29.924 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 500000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.5M | 62.6M | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.34 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.63 | 24.16 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.57 | 36.67 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.66 | -3.01 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement