CHLLF
Price
$3.27
Change
-$0.21 (-6.03%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.33B
CSXXY
Price
$52.74
Change
-$1.56 (-2.87%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
9.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHLLF vs CSXXY

Header iconCHLLF vs CSXXY Comparison
Open Charts CHLLF vs CSXXYBanner chart's image
China Literature
Price$3.27
Change-$0.21 (-6.03%)
Volume$900
Capitalization5.33B
CAR GROUP
Price$52.74
Change-$1.56 (-2.87%)
Volume$293
Capitalization9.89B
CHLLF vs CSXXY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSXXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHLLF vs. CSXXY commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHLLF is a Hold and CSXXY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CHLLF: $3.27 vs. CSXXY: $52.74)
Brand notoriety: CHLLF and CSXXY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHLLF: 100% vs. CSXXY: 10%
Market capitalization -- CHLLF: $5.33B vs. CSXXY: $9.89B
CHLLF [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $5.33B. CSXXY’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $9.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $2.58T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $76.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHLLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSXXY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHLLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSXXY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSXXY is a better buy in the long-term than CHLLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHLLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSXXY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHLLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • CSXXY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHLLF is a better buy in the short-term than CSXXY.

Price Growth

CHLLF (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CSXXY (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (+1.37% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSXXY($9.89B) has a higher market cap than CHLLF($5.33B). CHLLF has higher P/E ratio than CSXXY: CHLLF (179.98) vs CSXXY (55.63). CSXXY YTD gains are higher at: 19.026 vs. CHLLF (-7.462).
CHLLFCSXXYCHLLF / CSXXY
Capitalization5.33B9.89B54%
EBITDAN/A632M-
Gain YTD-7.46219.026-39%
P/E Ratio179.9855.63324%
RevenueN/A1.18B-
Total CashN/A289M-
Total DebtN/A1.41B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHLLF vs CSXXY: Fundamental Ratings
CHLLF
CSXXY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4397
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10027
SMR RATING
1..100
8391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
251
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSXXY's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHLLF (80). This means that CSXXY’s stock grew significantly faster than CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

CSXXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHLLF (100). This means that CSXXY’s stock grew significantly faster than CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

CHLLF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as CSXXY (91). This means that CHLLF’s stock grew similarly to CSXXY’s over the last 12 months.

CSXXY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CHLLF (75). This means that CSXXY’s stock grew similarly to CHLLF’s over the last 12 months.

CHLLF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSXXY (51). This means that CHLLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSXXY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHLLFCSXXY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSXXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PILL7.960.06
+0.76%
Direxion Daily Phrmctcl&MdclBl3XShrsETF
PFL8.500.01
+0.12%
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund
WTMU25.38N/A
N/A
WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal
EVX39.86-0.10
-0.25%
VanEck Environmental Svcs ETF
QTUM94.77-1.58
-1.64%
Defiance Quantum ETF

CSXXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSXXY and SKLTY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSXXY and SKLTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSXXY
1D Price
Change %
CSXXY100%
-2.87%
SKLTY - CSXXY
24%
Poorly correlated
+11.34%
AREN - CSXXY
14%
Poorly correlated
-4.84%
NAPRF - CSXXY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHLLF - CSXXY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKST - CSXXY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More