CHOLF
Price
$0.77
Change
-$0.13 (-14.44%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
8.46B
GZPZF
Price
$147.38
Change
+$8.38 (+6.03%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
4.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHOLF vs GZPZF

Header iconCHOLF vs GZPZF Comparison
Open Charts CHOLF vs GZPZFBanner chart's image
China Oilfield Services
Price$0.77
Change-$0.13 (-14.44%)
Volume$300
Capitalization8.46B
Gaztransport Technigaz
Price$147.38
Change+$8.38 (+6.03%)
Volume$5.34K
Capitalization4.52B
CHOLF vs GZPZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHOLF vs. GZPZF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHOLF is a Hold and GZPZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CHOLF: $0.77 vs. GZPZF: $147.38)
Brand notoriety: CHOLF and GZPZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHOLF: 128% vs. GZPZF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CHOLF: $8.46B vs. GZPZF: $4.52B
CHOLF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $8.46B. GZPZF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $4.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHOLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGZPZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHOLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GZPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GZPZF is a better buy in the long-term than CHOLF.

Price Growth

CHOLF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GZPZF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +2.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+2.62% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHOLF($8.46B) has a higher market cap than GZPZF($4.52B). GZPZF has higher P/E ratio than CHOLF: GZPZF (23.92) vs CHOLF (13.57). GZPZF YTD gains are higher at: 6.029 vs. CHOLF (-9.209). CHOLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.98B vs. GZPZF (183M). CHOLF has more cash in the bank: 8.86B vs. GZPZF (253M). GZPZF has less debt than CHOLF: GZPZF (6.5M) vs CHOLF (21.9B). CHOLF has higher revenues than GZPZF: CHOLF (37.3B) vs GZPZF (341M).
CHOLFGZPZFCHOLF / GZPZF
Capitalization8.46B4.52B187%
EBITDA3.98B183M2,173%
Gain YTD-9.2096.029-153%
P/E Ratio13.5723.9257%
Revenue37.3B341M10,938%
Total Cash8.86B253M3,501%
Total Debt21.9B6.5M337,079%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHOLF vs GZPZF: Fundamental Ratings
CHOLF
GZPZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3949
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
7614
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8193
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHOLF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as GZPZF (57). This means that CHOLF’s stock grew similarly to GZPZF’s over the last 12 months.

GZPZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHOLF (100). This means that GZPZF’s stock grew significantly faster than CHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

GZPZF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHOLF (76). This means that GZPZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

GZPZF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CHOLF (79). This means that GZPZF’s stock grew similarly to CHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

CHOLF's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as GZPZF (93). This means that CHOLF’s stock grew similarly to GZPZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WLCAX13.95N/A
N/A
Allspring Large Company Value A
PKSAX50.46N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core A
RYTAX186.39N/A
N/A
Rydex Technology H
NFAAX32.18N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Focus A
PBLAX46.47N/A
N/A
Principal Blue Chip A

CHOLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHOLF and HGHAF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHOLF and HGHAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHOLF
1D Price
Change %
CHOLF100%
N/A
HGHAF - CHOLF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
AKKVF - CHOLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AKRYY - CHOLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNTIF - CHOLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GZPZF - CHOLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GZPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GZPZF and TNRSF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GZPZF and TNRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GZPZF
1D Price
Change %
GZPZF100%
N/A
TNRSF - GZPZF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTK - GZPZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
CTNR - GZPZF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CESDF - GZPZF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
CHOLF - GZPZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More