CHRRF vs PAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHRRF is a Sell and PAC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHRRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CHRRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHRRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHRRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CHRRF (@Other Transportation) experienced а -6.83% price change this week, while PAC (@Other Transportation) price change was -5.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Transportation (-0.16% weekly)Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.
| CHRRF | PAC | CHRRF / PAC | |
| Capitalization | 291M | 8.25B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 503M | 18.6B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | 10.309 | 12.850 | 80% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.11 | 14.01 | 44% |
| Revenue | 1.68B | 32.1B | 5% |
| Total Cash | 86M | 14.5B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 1.76B | N/A | - |
CHRRF | PAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAC's Valuation (37) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as CHRRF (65) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to CHRRF’s over the last 12 months.
PAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHRRF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew significantly faster than CHRRF’s over the last 12 months.
PAC's SMR Rating (21) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHRRF (93) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew significantly faster than CHRRF’s over the last 12 months.
PAC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as CHRRF (45) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to CHRRF’s over the last 12 months.
CHRRF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as PAC (21) in the Other Transportation industry. This means that CHRRF’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.
| CHRRF | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 68% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSMP | 24.58 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco BulletShares 2025 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| PSMD | 29.09 | -0.06 | -0.19% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (January) ETF | |||
| GEM | 33.58 | -0.09 | -0.28% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® EMkts Eq ETF | |||
| SPMD | 56.88 | -0.64 | -1.11% |
| SPDR® Portfolio S&P 400™ Mid Cap ETF | |||
| IWML | 23.49 | -0.50 | -2.07% |
| ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Fctr TR ETN | |||
CHRRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHRRF and JOBY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHRRF and JOBY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHRRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRRF | 100% | -5.16% | ||
| JOBY - CHRRF | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.26% | ||
| ASR - CHRRF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| PAC - CHRRF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
| BLDE - CHRRF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.18% | ||
| OMAB - CHRRF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||
PAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with ASR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then ASR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC | 100% | -1.16% | ||
| ASR - PAC | 80% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| OMAB - PAC | 79% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CAAP - PAC | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| ASRMF - PAC | 27% Poorly correlated | +10.65% | ||
| CHRRF - PAC | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.16% | ||
More | ||||