CHRUF
Price
$5.35
Change
+$1.20 (+28.92%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.53B
MACT
Price
$7.60
Change
+$0.10 (+1.33%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
24.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHRUF vs MACT

Header iconCHRUF vs MACT Comparison
Open Charts CHRUF vs MACTBanner chart's image
CHORUS
Price$5.35
Change+$1.20 (+28.92%)
Volume$302
Capitalization2.53B
MachTen
Price$7.60
Change+$0.10 (+1.33%)
Volume$500
Capitalization24.86M
CHRUF vs MACT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHRUF vs. MACT commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHRUF is a Hold and MACT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CHRUF: $5.35 vs. MACT: $7.60)
Brand notoriety: CHRUF and MACT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHRUF: 100% vs. MACT: 21%
Market capitalization -- CHRUF: $2.53B vs. MACT: $24.86M
CHRUF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $2.53B. MACT’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $24.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $284.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHRUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMACT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHRUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MACT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHRUF is a better buy in the long-term than MACT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MACT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MACT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CHRUF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MACT (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.28% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHRUF($2.53B) has a higher market cap than MACT($24.9M). MACT YTD gains are higher at: 7.801 vs. CHRUF (0.000).
CHRUFMACTCHRUF / MACT
Capitalization2.53B24.9M10,145%
EBITDA705MN/A-
Gain YTD0.0007.801-
P/E Ratio271.17N/A-
Revenue1.01BN/A-
Total Cash45MN/A-
Total Debt2.8BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHRUFMACT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSURX24.310.05
+0.21%
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure R
LCGFX32.54N/A
N/A
William Blair Large Cap Growth I
AFJCX22.75N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ International Value C
LKSCX22.96N/A
N/A
LKCM Small Cap Equity Instl
BBIEX15.00N/A
N/A
Bridge Builder International Equity

CHRUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHRUF has been closely correlated with GTMEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHRUF jumps, then GTMEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHRUF
1D Price
Change %
CHRUF100%
N/A
GTMEF - CHRUF
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
AAFRF - CHRUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKBNF - CHRUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETLF - CHRUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KORE - CHRUF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
More

MACT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MACT and TCPFF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MACT and TCPFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MACT
1D Price
Change %
MACT100%
N/A
TCPFF - MACT
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETLF - MACT
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KORE - MACT
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
AAFRF - MACT
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHRUF - MACT
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More