Advertisement
CHRUF vs NETLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHRUF is a Hold and NETLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHRUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNETLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CHRUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NETLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CHRUF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NETLF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.02%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (-0.28% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CHRUF | NETLF | CHRUF / NETLF | |
| Capitalization | 2.51B | 2.83B | 89% |
| EBITDA | 705M | 303M | 233% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 9.608 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 271.17 | 39.23 | 691% |
| Revenue | 1.01B | 407M | 248% |
| Total Cash | 45M | 178M | 25% |
| Total Debt | 2.8B | 887M | 315% |
| CHRUF | NETLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 12% | 2 days ago 14% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 11% | 2 days ago 15% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AFJCX | 22.97 | 0.22 | +0.97% |
| Virtus NFJ International Value C | |||
| BBIEX | 15.09 | 0.09 | +0.60% |
| Bridge Builder International Equity | |||
| LKSCX | 23.01 | 0.05 | +0.22% |
| LKCM Small Cap Equity Instl | |||
| CSURX | 24.31 | 0.05 | +0.21% |
| Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure R | |||
| LCGFX | 32.47 | -0.07 | -0.22% |
| William Blair Large Cap Growth I | |||
CHRUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHRUF has been closely correlated with GTMEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHRUF jumps, then GTMEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHRUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GTMEF - CHRUF | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| AAFRF - CHRUF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HKBNF - CHRUF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NETLF - CHRUF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KORE - CHRUF | -2% Poorly correlated | -1.81% | ||
More | ||||
NETLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NETLF has been loosely correlated with TCPFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NETLF jumps, then TCPFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NETLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NETLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TCPFF - NETLF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MACT - NETLF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IHS - NETLF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| AAFRF - NETLF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HKBNF - NETLF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||