CHRUF vs NETLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHRUF is a Hold and NETLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHRUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNETLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHRUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NETLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
CHRUF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NETLF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +9.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.93%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wireless Telecommunications (+9.09% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| CHRUF | NETLF | CHRUF / NETLF | |
| Capitalization | 2.34B | 2.5B | 94% |
| EBITDA | 610M | 302M | 202% |
| Gain YTD | 22.146 | 9.487 | 233% |
| P/E Ratio | 121.95 | 28.65 | 426% |
| Revenue | 978M | 403M | 243% |
| Total Cash | 88M | 201M | 44% |
| Total Debt | 2.51B | 765M | 328% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ACIPX | 17.26 | -0.02 | -0.12% |
| American Century Mid Cap Value G | |||
| FWDDX | 10.66 | -0.07 | -0.65% |
| American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc 529-F-2 | |||
| BRAGX | 100.85 | -0.88 | -0.87% |
| Bridgeway Aggressive Investors 1 | |||
| RWGIX | 5.96 | -0.06 | -1.00% |
| Wedgewood Institutional | |||
| BSMKX | 17.46 | -0.21 | -1.19% |
| iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Idx K | |||
CHRUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHRUF has been closely correlated with GTMEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHRUF jumps, then GTMEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHRUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GTMEF - CHRUF | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| AAFRF - CHRUF | 1% Poorly correlated | -5.69% | ||
| HKBNF - CHRUF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NETLF - CHRUF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KORE - CHRUF | -2% Poorly correlated | +6.51% | ||
More | ||||
NETLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NETLF has been loosely correlated with TCPFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NETLF jumps, then TCPFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NETLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NETLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TCPFF - NETLF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MACT - NETLF | 7% Poorly correlated | +6.38% | ||
| IHS - NETLF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| AAFRF - NETLF | -0% Poorly correlated | -5.69% | ||
| HKBNF - NETLF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||