CHTH
Price
$3.31
Change
-$0.30 (-8.31%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
630.99M
FESNF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.03 (-13.04%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
459.68M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHTH vs FESNF

Header iconCHTH vs FESNF Comparison
Open Charts CHTH vs FESNFBanner chart's image
CNL Healthcare Pptys
Price$3.31
Change-$0.30 (-8.31%)
Volume$2.87K
Capitalization630.99M
First Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$0.20
Change-$0.03 (-13.04%)
Volume$935
Capitalization459.68M
CHTH vs FESNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHTH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FESNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHTH vs. FESNF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTH is a StrongBuy and FESNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CHTH: $3.31 vs. FESNF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: CHTH and FESNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHTH: 55% vs. FESNF: 15%
Market capitalization -- CHTH: $630.99M vs. FESNF: $459.68M
CHTH [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $630.99M. FESNF’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $459.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $116.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHTH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFESNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHTH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FESNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHTH is a better buy in the long-term than FESNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHTH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FESNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHTH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FESNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHTH is a better buy in the short-term than FESNF.

Price Growth

CHTH (@Managed Health Care) experienced а -8.31% price change this week, while FESNF (@Managed Health Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (-1.46% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHTH($631M) has a higher market cap than FESNF($460M). CHTH YTD gains are higher at: 18.214 vs. FESNF (3.773). CHTH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 84.8M vs. FESNF (71.3M). CHTH has more cash in the bank: 53.2M vs. FESNF (35.6M). FESNF has less debt than CHTH: FESNF (462M) vs CHTH (563M). CHTH has higher revenues than FESNF: CHTH (379M) vs FESNF (101M).
CHTHFESNFCHTH / FESNF
Capitalization631M460M137%
EBITDA84.8M71.3M119%
Gain YTD18.2143.773483%
P/E RatioN/A13.91-
Revenue379M101M375%
Total Cash53.2M35.6M149%
Total Debt563M462M122%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FESNF: Fundamental Ratings
FESNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHTHFESNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHTH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FESNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WAFMX3.84N/A
N/A
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Inv
ICEIX25.30N/A
N/A
Macquarie International Core Eq I
OPTFX95.36N/A
N/A
Invesco Discovery Large Cap A
ERBCX19.86N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Equity Strategy C
MCYIX13.33-0.07
-0.52%
NYLI Candriam Emerging Markets Eq Cl I

CHTH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHTH and LNSPF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHTH and LNSPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHTH
1D Price
Change %
CHTH100%
N/A
LNSPF - CHTH
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPIF - CHTH
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEIYF - CHTH
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FESNF - CHTH
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRWRF - CHTH
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FESNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FESNF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FESNF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FESNF
1D Price
Change %
FESNF100%
N/A
MAPIF - FESNF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LNSPF - FESNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DOC - FESNF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
CHTH - FESNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEIYF - FESNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More