Advertisement
CHTM vs ESAB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTM is a Hold and ESAB is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHTM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CHTM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ESAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHTM’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESAB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHTM’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
- ESAB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CHTM (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ESAB (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -2.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -3.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESAB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Metal Fabrication (-3.76% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| CHTM | ESAB | CHTM / ESAB | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 7.91B | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | 515M | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.058 | 8.902 | -169% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 27.06 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 2.73B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 47.1M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.16B | - |
CHTM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CHTM | ESAB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 7% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 11% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 8% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
CHTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHTM and GFLT have been poorly correlated (+-0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHTM and GFLT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHTM | 100% | N/A | ||
| GFLT - CHTM | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BEKAY - CHTM | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ESAB - CHTM | -1% Poorly correlated | -2.79% | ||
| RMTO - CHTM | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CMPO - CHTM | -3% Poorly correlated | -2.39% |
ESAB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESAB has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESAB jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESAB | 100% | -2.79% | ||
| MLI - ESAB | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| NWPX - ESAB | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| CRS - ESAB | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
| PRLB - ESAB | 49% Loosely correlated | +10.09% | ||
| IIIN - ESAB | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.19% | ||
More | ||||