Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHTTX vs FLPSX
CHTTX vs FLPSX Comparison
Open Charts CHTTX vs FLPSX
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value N
Price$21.02
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.14M
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$39.98
Change-$0.09 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.89B
CHTTX vs FLPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHTTX vs. FLPSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTTX is a Hold and FLPSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. CHTTX (337M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than CHTTX: FLPSX (1.93) vs CHTTX (0.27). CHTTX was incepted earlier than FLPSX: CHTTX (31 years) vs FLPSX (36 years). CHTTX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FLPSX (0.87). CHTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FLPSX (22.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHTTX: FLPSX (0) vs CHTTX (2000). FLPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.57 vs. CHTTX (-9.56). FLPSX return over 5 years is better than : -8.33 vs. CHTTX (-36.73).
| CHTTX | FLPSX | CHTTX / FLPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.87 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.87 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.917 | -0.257 | -1,523% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337M | 22.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 1.93 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.56 | -6.57 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.50 | -9.79 | -148% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.73 | -8.33 | 441% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.66 | -10.04 | 425% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers