Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHTTX vs VEVYX
CHTTX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts CHTTX vs VEVYX
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value N
Price$21.98
Change-$0.10 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets349.1M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$46.20
Change-$0.23 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.33B
CHTTX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHTTX vs. VEVYX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTTX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. CHTTX (349M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than CHTTX: VEVYX (1.08) vs CHTTX (0.27). CHTTX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: CHTTX (31 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). CHTTX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). CHTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). CHTTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: CHTTX (2000) vs VEVYX (1000000). CHTTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.18 vs. VEVYX (-6.73). VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 35.47 vs. CHTTX (-29.21).
| CHTTX | VEVYX | CHTTX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.66 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.66 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.470 | 1.636 | 579% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 349M | 17.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 1.08 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.18 | -6.73 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.82 | -2.31 | -814% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.21 | 35.47 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.67 | 45.75 | -89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers