Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHTTX vs VEVYX
CHTTX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts CHTTX vs VEVYX
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value N
Price$21.02
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.14M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$44.91
Change-$0.17 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.82B
CHTTX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHTTX vs. VEVYX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTTX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. CHTTX (337M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than CHTTX: VEVYX (1.05) vs CHTTX (0.27). CHTTX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: CHTTX (31 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). CHTTX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). CHTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). CHTTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: CHTTX (2000) vs VEVYX (1000000). CHTTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.56 vs. VEVYX (-12.99). VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 19.42 vs. CHTTX (-36.73).
| CHTTX | VEVYX | CHTTX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.66 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.66 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.917 | -1.135 | -345% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337M | 15.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 1.05 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.56 | -12.99 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.50 | -2.70 | -537% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.73 | 19.42 | -189% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.66 | 42.90 | -99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers