Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHTTX vs VEVYX
CHTTX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts CHTTX vs VEVYX
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value N
Price$20.39
Change-$0.28 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets339.59M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$44.71
Change-$0.54 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.12B
CHTTX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHTTX vs. VEVYX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTTX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. CHTTX (340M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than CHTTX: VEVYX (1.12) vs CHTTX (0.29). CHTTX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: CHTTX (31 years) vs VEVYX (12 years). CHTTX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). CHTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). CHTTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: CHTTX (2000) vs VEVYX (1000000). CHTTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.11 vs. VEVYX (-6.53). VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 40.61 vs. CHTTX (-26.14).
| CHTTX | VEVYX | CHTTX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.66 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.66 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.479 | -2.497 | -99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340M | 17.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.12 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.11 | -6.53 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.55 | 4.61 | 555% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.14 | 40.61 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.63 | 42.12 | -118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement