Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHTTX vs VEVYX
CHTTX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts CHTTX vs VEVYX
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value N
Price$20.24
Change-$0.48 (-2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.91M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$44.57
Change-$1.05 (-2.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.61B
CHTTX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHTTX vs. VEVYX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTTX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.6B vs. CHTTX (341M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than CHTTX: VEVYX (1.15) vs CHTTX (0.30). CHTTX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: CHTTX (31 years) vs VEVYX (12 years). CHTTX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). CHTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). CHTTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: CHTTX (2000) vs VEVYX (1000000). CHTTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.99 vs. VEVYX (-7.05). VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 51.61 vs. CHTTX (-21.73).
| CHTTX | VEVYX | CHTTX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.66 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.66 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.727 | -0.513 | -532% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341M | 17.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.15 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.99 | -7.05 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.54 | 2.88 | 748% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.73 | 51.61 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.91 | 43.59 | -115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement