CHUEF
Price
$9.01
Change
-$1.89 (-17.34%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
9.57B
CLPHF
Price
$8.00
Change
-$0.73 (-8.36%)
Updated
Jan 23 closing price
Capitalization
20.56B
Ad is loading...

CHUEF vs CLPHF

Header iconCHUEF vs CLPHF Comparison
Open Charts CHUEF vs CLPHFBanner chart's image
Chubu Electric Power
Price$9.01
Change-$1.89 (-17.34%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.57B
CLP Holdings
Price$8.00
Change-$0.73 (-8.36%)
Volume$430
Capitalization20.56B
CHUEF vs CLPHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CHUEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHUEF vs. CLPHF commentary
Jan 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHUEF is a Hold and CLPHF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CHUEF: $9.01 vs. CLPHF: $8.50)
Brand notoriety: CHUEF and CLPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHUEF: 3% vs. CLPHF: 8%
Market capitalization -- CHUEF: $9.57B vs. CLPHF: $20.56B
CHUEF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $9.57B. CLPHF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $20.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHUEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLPHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHUEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CLPHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHUEF is a better buy in the long-term than CLPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHUEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLPHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHUEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CLPHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHUEF is a better buy in the short-term than CLPHF.

Price Growth

CHUEF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLPHF (@Electric Utilities) price change was +3.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-1.55% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLPHF($20.6B) has a higher market cap than CHUEF($9.58B). CLPHF has higher P/E ratio than CHUEF: CLPHF (166.67) vs CHUEF (33.00). CLPHF YTD gains are higher at: 6.250 vs. CHUEF (-10.436). CLPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.2B vs. CHUEF (-37.09B). CHUEF has more cash in the bank: 387B vs. CLPHF (4.25B). CLPHF has less debt than CHUEF: CLPHF (59.4B) vs CHUEF (2.68T). CHUEF has higher revenues than CLPHF: CHUEF (3.69T) vs CLPHF (101B).
CHUEFCLPHFCHUEF / CLPHF
Capitalization9.58B20.6B46%
EBITDA-37.09B12.2B-304%
Gain YTD-10.4366.250-167%
P/E Ratio33.00166.6720%
Revenue3.69T101B3,655%
Total Cash387B4.25B9,099%
Total Debt2.68T59.4B4,519%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHUEF vs CLPHF: Fundamental Ratings
CHUEF
CLPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3283
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2670
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHUEF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHF (29). This means that CHUEF’s stock grew similarly to CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

CHUEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHF (100). This means that CHUEF’s stock grew similarly to CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

CHUEF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHF (100). This means that CHUEF’s stock grew similarly to CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

CLPHF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CHUEF (85). This means that CLPHF’s stock grew similarly to CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

CHUEF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPHF (70). This means that CHUEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHUEFCLPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
12%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CHUEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PARMX39.250.23
+0.59%
Parnassus Mid-Cap
PMBJX42.44N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap J
LSPAX5.64N/A
N/A
LoCorr Spectrum Income A
FEQAX13.46N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Hedged Equity Fund A
KLGCX41.69-1.29
-3.00%
NYLI WMC Growth Class C

CHUEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHUEF and CKISF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHUEF and CKISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHUEF
1D Price
Change %
CHUEF100%
N/A
CKISF - CHUEF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPHF - CHUEF
9%
Poorly correlated
+6.25%
AGLXY - CHUEF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
CPXWF - CHUEF
4%
Poorly correlated
-17.12%
CDUAF - CHUEF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
More

CLPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPHF and ACEJF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPHF and ACEJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPHF
1D Price
Change %
CLPHF100%
+6.25%
ACEJF - CLPHF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKISY - CLPHF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPHY - CLPHF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
CHUEF - CLPHF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGLNF - CLPHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More