CHUEF
Price
$12.67
Change
+$0.39 (+3.18%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
9.57B
CPXWF
Price
$40.44
Change
+$0.18 (+0.45%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHUEF vs CPXWF

Header iconCHUEF vs CPXWF Comparison
Open Charts CHUEF vs CPXWFBanner chart's image
Chubu Electric Power
Price$12.67
Change+$0.39 (+3.18%)
Volume$5.71K
Capitalization9.57B
Capital Power
Price$40.44
Change+$0.18 (+0.45%)
Volume$2.94K
Capitalization3.68B
CHUEF vs CPXWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHUEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPXWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHUEF vs. CPXWF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHUEF is a Hold and CPXWF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CHUEF: $12.67 vs. CPXWF: $40.44)
Brand notoriety: CHUEF and CPXWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHUEF: 110% vs. CPXWF: 64%
Market capitalization -- CHUEF: $9.57B vs. CPXWF: $3.68B
CHUEF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $9.57B. CPXWF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $3.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHUEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCPXWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHUEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CPXWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPXWF is a better buy in the long-term than CHUEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHUEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPXWF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHUEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CPXWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPXWF is a better buy in the short-term than CHUEF.

Price Growth

CHUEF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +24.58% price change this week, while CPXWF (@Electric Utilities) price change was -2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.90% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHUEF($9.58B) has a higher market cap than CPXWF($3.68B). CHUEF has higher P/E ratio than CPXWF: CHUEF (33.00) vs CPXWF (18.45). CHUEF YTD gains are higher at: 25.944 vs. CPXWF (-9.252). CPXWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.06B vs. CHUEF (-37.09B). CHUEF has more cash in the bank: 387B vs. CPXWF (245M). CPXWF has less debt than CHUEF: CPXWF (3.62B) vs CHUEF (2.68T). CHUEF has higher revenues than CPXWF: CHUEF (3.69T) vs CPXWF (3.57B).
CHUEFCPXWFCHUEF / CPXWF
Capitalization9.58B3.68B260%
EBITDA-37.09B1.06B-3,489%
Gain YTD25.944-9.252-280%
P/E Ratio33.0018.45179%
Revenue3.69T3.57B103,562%
Total Cash387B245M157,959%
Total Debt2.68T3.62B74,164%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHUEF vs CPXWF: Fundamental Ratings
CHUEF
CPXWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10038
SMR RATING
1..100
10055
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPXWF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as CHUEF (45). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHUEF (100). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHUEF (100). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CHUEF (49). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

CHUEF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as CPXWF (16). This means that CHUEF’s stock grew similarly to CPXWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHUEFCPXWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
25%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHUEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPXWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRZU67.451.70
+2.59%
Direxion Daily MSCI Brazil Bull 2X ETF
UXOC32.440.31
+0.97%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Uncppd Acceler ETF - Oct
DEM46.160.23
+0.50%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Div ETF
JPSV58.460.28
+0.49%
JPMorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF
IBMN26.750.03
+0.13%
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bd ETF

CHUEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHUEF and CKISF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHUEF and CKISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHUEF
1D Price
Change %
CHUEF100%
N/A
CKISF - CHUEF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPHF - CHUEF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGLXY - CHUEF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPXWF - CHUEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
CDUAF - CHUEF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
More

CPXWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPXWF has been loosely correlated with TAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPXWF jumps, then TAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPXWF
1D Price
Change %
CPXWF100%
+0.44%
TAC - CPXWF
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.39%
ACLLF - CPXWF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
BIP - CPXWF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
NWE - CPXWF
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
FTS - CPXWF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
More