CHUEF
Price
$12.74
Change
+$0.25 (+2.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.57B
CPXWF
Price
$45.48
Change
+$0.04 (+0.09%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHUEF vs CPXWF

Header iconCHUEF vs CPXWF Comparison
Open Charts CHUEF vs CPXWFBanner chart's image
Chubu Electric Power
Price$12.74
Change+$0.25 (+2.00%)
Volume$2.25K
Capitalization9.57B
Capital Power
Price$45.48
Change+$0.04 (+0.09%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization3.68B
CHUEF vs CPXWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHUEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPXWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHUEF vs. CPXWF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHUEF is a StrongBuy and CPXWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CHUEF: $12.74 vs. CPXWF: $45.32)
Brand notoriety: CHUEF and CPXWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHUEF: 22% vs. CPXWF: 5%
Market capitalization -- CHUEF: $9.57B vs. CPXWF: $3.68B
CHUEF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $9.57B. CPXWF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $3.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHUEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCPXWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CHUEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CPXWF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPXWF is a better buy in the long-term than CHUEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHUEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPXWF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHUEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CPXWF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPXWF is a better buy in the short-term than CHUEF.

Price Growth

CHUEF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while CPXWF (@Electric Utilities) price change was +2.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+1.17% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHUEF($9.58B) has a higher market cap than CPXWF($3.68B). CHUEF has higher P/E ratio than CPXWF: CHUEF (33.00) vs CPXWF (18.45). CHUEF YTD gains are higher at: 26.640 vs. CPXWF (2.076). CPXWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.06B vs. CHUEF (-37.09B). CHUEF has more cash in the bank: 387B vs. CPXWF (245M). CPXWF has less debt than CHUEF: CPXWF (3.62B) vs CHUEF (2.68T). CHUEF has higher revenues than CPXWF: CHUEF (3.69T) vs CPXWF (3.57B).
CHUEFCPXWFCHUEF / CPXWF
Capitalization9.58B3.68B260%
EBITDA-37.09B1.06B-3,489%
Gain YTD26.6402.0761,283%
P/E Ratio33.0018.45179%
Revenue3.69T3.57B103,562%
Total Cash387B245M157,959%
Total Debt2.68T3.62B74,164%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHUEF vs CPXWF: Fundamental Ratings
CHUEF
CPXWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10028
SMR RATING
1..100
10055
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1013
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPXWF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as CHUEF (44). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHUEF (100). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew significantly faster than CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHUEF (100). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CHUEF (43). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to CHUEF’s over the last 12 months.

CHUEF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as CPXWF (13). This means that CHUEF’s stock grew similarly to CPXWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHUEFCPXWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHUEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPXWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRGF66.010.26
+0.40%
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
QMAG22.580.06
+0.28%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - Aug
LSEQ27.860.03
+0.12%
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
NAIL62.58N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily Hmbldrs&Supls Bull 3X ETF
CGV13.88-0.10
-0.72%
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF

CHUEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHUEF and CKISF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHUEF and CKISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHUEF
1D Price
Change %
CHUEF100%
+2.00%
CKISF - CHUEF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPHF - CHUEF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGLXY - CHUEF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
CPXWF - CHUEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
CDUAF - CHUEF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More

CPXWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPXWF has been loosely correlated with TAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPXWF jumps, then TAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPXWF
1D Price
Change %
CPXWF100%
+0.08%
TAC - CPXWF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
ACLLF - CPXWF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
BIP - CPXWF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
NWE - CPXWF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FTS - CPXWF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
More