Ad is loading...
CHUSX vs RNPFX
CHUSX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CHUSX vs RNPFX
Alger Global Equity A
Price$24.79
Change-$1.25 (-4.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.6M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$59.13
Change-$2.45 (-3.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
CHUSX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHUSX vs. RNPFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHUSX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. CHUSX (19.6M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CHUSX: RNPFX (0.84) vs CHUSX (0.00). CHUSX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CHUSX (21 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). CHUSX (2.30) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). CHUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHUSX: RNPFX (250) vs CHUSX (1000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. CHUSX (-13.00). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.60 vs. CHUSX (46.70).
| CHUSX | RNPFX | CHUSX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.46 | 261% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.46 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.633 | -0.741 | 895% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.6M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.84 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.00 | 2.65 | -490% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.36 | 3.11 | -301% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.70 | 70.60 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.07 | 64.56 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...