CHXMF
Price
$0.73
Change
+$0.05 (+7.35%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
279.21M
GRSLF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
50.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHXMF vs GRSLF

Header iconCHXMF vs GRSLF Comparison
Open Charts CHXMF vs GRSLFBanner chart's image
Troilus Gold
Price$0.73
Change+$0.05 (+7.35%)
Volume$144.89K
Capitalization279.21M
GR SILVER MNG
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$698.52K
Capitalization50.7M
CHXMF vs GRSLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHXMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHXMF vs. GRSLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHXMF is a Buy and GRSLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CHXMF: $0.73 vs. GRSLF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: CHXMF and GRSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHXMF: 272% vs. GRSLF: 129%
Market capitalization -- CHXMF: $279.21M vs. GRSLF: $50.7M
CHXMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $279.21M. GRSLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $50.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHXMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHXMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRSLF is a better buy in the long-term than CHXMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHXMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRSLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHXMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRSLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHXMF is a better buy in the short-term than GRSLF.

Price Growth

CHXMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +19.31% price change this week, while GRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +10.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHXMF($279M) has a higher market cap than GRSLF($50.7M). CHXMF YTD gains are higher at: 258.561 vs. GRSLF (30.909). GRSLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -9.13M vs. CHXMF (-29.41M). CHXMF has more cash in the bank: 16.1M vs. GRSLF (1.72M). CHXMF (0) and GRSLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CHXMFGRSLFCHXMF / GRSLF
Capitalization279M50.7M550%
EBITDA-29.41M-9.13M322%
Gain YTD258.56130.909837%
P/E RatioN/A2.84-
Revenue00-
Total Cash16.1M1.72M938%
Total Debt1.35MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHXMF vs GRSLF: Fundamental Ratings
CHXMF
GRSLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2618
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3556
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRSLF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CHXMF (78). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew similarly to CHXMF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CHXMF (100). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew similarly to CHXMF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHXMF (99). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CHXMF’s over the last 12 months.

CHXMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GRSLF (56). This means that CHXMF’s stock grew similarly to GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

CHXMF's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRSLF (100). This means that CHXMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHXMFGRSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHXMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPEAX5.15N/A
N/A
Voya Large Cap Value Port A
FBSOX53.14N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Enterprise Tech Svcs
JMCCX60.49N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity C
VSFRX24.69N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value R
EILAX13.93N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance International Small-Cap A

CHXMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHXMF and LUCMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHXMF and LUCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHXMF
1D Price
Change %
CHXMF100%
+6.40%
LUCMF - CHXMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
NWCCF - CHXMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.81%
AZMCF - CHXMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
GRSLF - CHXMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.67%
CBULF - CHXMF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRSLF has been loosely correlated with AAGFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRSLF jumps, then AAGFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRSLF
1D Price
Change %
GRSLF100%
+6.67%
AAGFF - GRSLF
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
AGXPF - GRSLF
45%
Loosely correlated
+12.07%
TECK - GRSLF
41%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
EMX - GRSLF
40%
Loosely correlated
+6.54%
VZLA - GRSLF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.76%
More