CHXMF
Price
$0.48
Change
-$0.03 (-5.88%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
104.58M
LUCMF
Price
$1.19
Change
+$0.02 (+1.71%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
49.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHXMF vs LUCMF

Header iconCHXMF vs LUCMF Comparison
Open Charts CHXMF vs LUCMFBanner chart's image
Troilus Gold
Price$0.48
Change-$0.03 (-5.88%)
Volume$201.36K
Capitalization104.58M
LUCA MINING
Price$1.19
Change+$0.02 (+1.71%)
Volume$356.51K
Capitalization49.71M
CHXMF vs LUCMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHXMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHXMF vs. LUCMF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHXMF is a Hold and LUCMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CHXMF: $0.48 vs. LUCMF: $1.19)
Brand notoriety: CHXMF and LUCMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHXMF: 319% vs. LUCMF: 62%
Market capitalization -- CHXMF: $104.58M vs. LUCMF: $49.71M
CHXMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $104.58M. LUCMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $49.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHXMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLUCMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHXMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LUCMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUCMF is a better buy in the long-term than CHXMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHXMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUCMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHXMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LUCMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUCMF is a better buy in the short-term than CHXMF.

Price Growth

CHXMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.41% price change this week, while LUCMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +6.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHXMF($105M) has a higher market cap than LUCMF($49.7M). CHXMF has higher P/E ratio than LUCMF: CHXMF (18.18) vs LUCMF (1.17). LUCMF YTD gains are higher at: 205.206 vs. CHXMF (138.039). CHXMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.91M vs. LUCMF (-4.28M). CHXMF has more cash in the bank: 17.9M vs. LUCMF (3.62M). CHXMF has less debt than LUCMF: CHXMF (1.07M) vs LUCMF (43.8M). LUCMF has higher revenues than CHXMF: LUCMF (65.1M) vs CHXMF (0).
CHXMFLUCMFCHXMF / LUCMF
Capitalization105M49.7M211%
EBITDA-3.91M-4.28M91%
Gain YTD138.039205.20667%
P/E Ratio18.181.171,558%
Revenue065.1M-
Total Cash17.9M3.62M495%
Total Debt1.07M43.8M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHXMF vs LUCMF: Fundamental Ratings
CHXMF
LUCMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6235
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
9893
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
715
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHXMF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as LUCMF (76). This means that CHXMF’s stock grew similarly to LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CHXMF (100). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew similarly to CHXMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CHXMF (98). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew similarly to CHXMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CHXMF (38). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew similarly to CHXMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHXMF (71). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew significantly faster than CHXMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHXMFLUCMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHXMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRRSF0.440.05
+12.75%
Norsemont Mining Inc.
VLKPF115.644.09
+3.67%
Volkswagen AG
BZZUF53.00N/A
N/A
Buzzi SpA
TBLMF18.00N/A
N/A
Tiger Brands Ltd.
MANOF1.04N/A
N/A
Manolete Partners Plc

CHXMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHXMF and LUCMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHXMF and LUCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHXMF
1D Price
Change %
CHXMF100%
-5.27%
LUCMF - CHXMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
NWCCF - CHXMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-10.58%
AZMCF - CHXMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.81%
GRSLF - CHXMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.72%
CBULF - CHXMF
13%
Poorly correlated
+49.83%
More

LUCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LUCMF and AAGFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUCMF and AAGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUCMF
1D Price
Change %
LUCMF100%
+1.80%
AAGFF - LUCMF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
AOTVF - LUCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-8.66%
LUNMF - LUCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
TGB - LUCMF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARREF - LUCMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.97%
More