CIADF
Price
$2.50
Change
+$1.02 (+68.92%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
14.88B
CIADY
Price
$23.19
Change
-$1.83 (-7.31%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
14.88B
Ad is loading...

CIADF vs CIADY

Header iconCIADF vs CIADY Comparison
Open Charts CIADF vs CIADYBanner chart's image
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$2.50
Change+$1.02 (+68.92%)
Volume$100
Capitalization14.88B
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$23.19
Change-$1.83 (-7.31%)
Volume$13.56K
Capitalization14.88B
CIADF vs CIADY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIADF vs. CIADY commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To understand the difference between China Mengniu Dairy Company Limited (CIADF) vs. China Mengniu Dairy Company Limited - ADR (CIADY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CIADF: $2.50 vs. CIADY: $23.19)
Brand notoriety: CIADF and CIADY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIADF: 5% vs. CIADY: 191%
Market capitalization -- CIADF: $14.88B vs. CIADY: $14.88B
CIADF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $14.88B. CIADY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $14.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIADF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCIADY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CIADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CIADY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CIADF and CIADY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIADY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CIADY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CIADF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +68.92% price change this week, while CIADY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -4.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIADF($14.9B) and CIADY($14.9B) have the same market capitalization . CIADF has higher P/E ratio than CIADY: CIADF (21.83) vs CIADY (19.12). CIADF YTD gains are higher at: 68.919 vs. CIADY (4.266). CIADY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.5B vs. CIADF (9.01B). CIADY (92.6B) and CIADF (88.1B) have equivalent revenues.
CIADFCIADYCIADF / CIADY
Capitalization14.9B14.9B100%
EBITDA9.01B10.5B86%
Gain YTD68.9194.2661,616%
P/E Ratio21.8319.12114%
Revenue88.1B92.6B95%
Total Cash15.9BN/A-
Total Debt27BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIADF vs CIADY: Fundamental Ratings
CIADF
CIADY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5512
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIADY's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (59). This means that CIADY’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (100). This means that CIADY’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADF (55). This means that CIADY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (51). This means that CIADF’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (1). This means that CIADF’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIADY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ECEIX9.99-0.51
-4.86%
Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Inst
WVMIX10.10-0.56
-5.25%
William Blair Mid Cap Value I
PCAOX68.12-4.14
-5.73%
Principal Capital Appreciation R3
ABVAX15.42-0.96
-5.86%
AB Large Cap Value A
CDHAX28.24-1.82
-6.05%
Calvert International Responsible Idx A

CIADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIADF and SHVTF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIADF and SHVTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADF
1D Price
Change %
CIADF100%
N/A
SHVTF - CIADF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFEIY - CIADF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - CIADF
5%
Poorly correlated
+13.56%
DANOY - CIADF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
CIADY - CIADF
0%
Poorly correlated
-7.33%
More

CIADY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIADY has been loosely correlated with TYCMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIADY jumps, then TYCMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADY
1D Price
Change %
CIADY100%
-7.33%
TYCMY - CIADY
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.66%
WHGLY - CIADY
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
DAR - CIADY
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.15%
RSGUF - CIADY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
DANOY - CIADY
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
More