CIADF
Price
$2.50
Change
+$1.02 (+68.92%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
8.18B
CIADY
Price
$20.95
Change
+$0.08 (+0.38%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
8.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIADF vs CIADY

Header iconCIADF vs CIADY Comparison
Open Charts CIADF vs CIADYBanner chart's image
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$2.50
Change+$1.02 (+68.92%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.18B
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$20.95
Change+$0.08 (+0.38%)
Volume$704
Capitalization8.18B
CIADF vs CIADY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIADF vs. CIADY commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To understand the difference between China Mengniu Dairy Company Limited (CIADF) vs. China Mengniu Dairy Company Limited - ADR (CIADY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CIADF: $2.50 vs. CIADY: $20.95)
Brand notoriety: CIADF and CIADY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIADF: 100% vs. CIADY: 20%
Market capitalization -- CIADF: $8.18B vs. CIADY: $8.18B
CIADF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $8.18B. CIADY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $8.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIADF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCIADY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CIADY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIADF is a better buy in the long-term than CIADY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIADY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CIADY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 8 bearish.

Price Growth

CIADF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIADY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1016.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.96% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIADF($8.18B) and CIADY($8.18B) have the same market capitalization . CIADF has higher P/E ratio than CIADY: CIADF (664.16) vs CIADY (556.71). CIADF YTD gains are higher at: 68.919 vs. CIADY (-2.695).
CIADFCIADYCIADF / CIADY
Capitalization8.18B8.18B100%
EBITDAN/A5.87B-
Gain YTD68.919-2.695-2,557%
P/E Ratio664.16556.71119%
RevenueN/A88.7B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIADF vs CIADY: Fundamental Ratings
CIADF
CIADY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIADY's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (55). This means that CIADY’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (100). This means that CIADY’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADY (92). This means that CIADF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (52). This means that CIADF’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (1). This means that CIADF’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIADFCIADY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QDWN11.850.23
+2.01%
Dailydelta Q100 Downside Option Strategy ETF
RITA19.050.06
+0.30%
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF
GLOV56.110.10
+0.18%
Goldman Sachs ActBt Wld Lw Vl Ps Eq ETF
BUXX20.410.02
+0.10%
Strive Enhanced Income Short MaturityETF
MIDU47.24-0.82
-1.71%
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X ETF

CIADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIADF and SHVTF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIADF and SHVTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADF
1D Price
Change %
CIADF100%
N/A
SHVTF - CIADF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFEIY - CIADF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - CIADF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.49%
DANOY - CIADF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
CIADY - CIADF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More

CIADY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIADY has been loosely correlated with TYCMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIADY jumps, then TYCMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADY
1D Price
Change %
CIADY100%
+0.38%
TYCMY - CIADY
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
WHGLY - CIADY
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
DAR - CIADY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
RSGUF - CIADY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
DANOY - CIADY
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
More