CIADY
Price
$20.88
Change
+$0.11 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.88B
FPAFY
Price
$3.72
Change
+$0.04 (+1.09%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIADY vs FPAFY

Header iconCIADY vs FPAFY Comparison
Open Charts CIADY vs FPAFYBanner chart's image
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$20.88
Change+$0.11 (+0.53%)
Volume$2.22K
Capitalization14.88B
First Pacific
Price$3.72
Change+$0.04 (+1.09%)
Volume$13.59K
Capitalization1.53B
CIADY vs FPAFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIADY vs. FPAFY commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIADY is a StrongBuy and FPAFY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CIADY: $20.88 vs. FPAFY: $3.72)
Brand notoriety: CIADY and FPAFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIADY: 73% vs. FPAFY: 52%
Market capitalization -- CIADY: $14.88B vs. FPAFY: $1.53B
CIADY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $14.88B. FPAFY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIADY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFPAFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CIADY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FPAFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPAFY is a better buy in the long-term than CIADY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIADY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPAFY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIADY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FPAFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CIADY and FPAFY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CIADY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.48% price change this week, while FPAFY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIADY is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

FPAFY is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIADY($14.9B) has a higher market cap than FPAFY($1.53B). CIADY has higher P/E ratio than FPAFY: CIADY (19.12) vs FPAFY (3.93). FPAFY YTD gains are higher at: 34.578 vs. CIADY (-3.020). CIADY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.5B vs. FPAFY (2.33B). CIADY has higher revenues than FPAFY: CIADY (92.6B) vs FPAFY (10.3B).
CIADYFPAFYCIADY / FPAFY
Capitalization14.9B1.53B971%
EBITDA10.5B2.33B452%
Gain YTD-3.02034.578-9%
P/E Ratio19.123.93487%
Revenue92.6B10.3B899%
Total CashN/A2.09B-
Total DebtN/A11.3B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIADY vs FPAFY: Fundamental Ratings
CIADY
FPAFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8685
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1003
SMR RATING
1..100
9397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
122
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FPAFY's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (47). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIADY (100). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew significantly faster than CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFY (97). This means that CIADY’s stock grew similarly to FPAFY’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (57). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFY (22). This means that CIADY’s stock grew similarly to FPAFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIADYFPAFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ION30.350.16
+0.53%
ProShares S&P Global Cor Btty Mtls ETF
DBA25.890.02
+0.08%
Invesco DB Agriculture
SPXT96.19N/A
N/A
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Technology
SRHR55.32N/A
N/A
SRH REIT Covered Call ETF
IGSB52.48-0.05
-0.10%
iShares 1-5 Year invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF

CIADY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIADY has been loosely correlated with TYCMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIADY jumps, then TYCMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADY
1D Price
Change %
CIADY100%
+0.53%
TYCMY - CIADY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
WHGLY - CIADY
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
DAR - CIADY
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
RSGUF - CIADY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
DANOY - CIADY
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
More

FPAFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAFY and WHGLY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAFY and WHGLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAFY
1D Price
Change %
FPAFY100%
+1.09%
WHGLY - FPAFY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
CUSI - FPAFY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GUZOF - FPAFY
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - FPAFY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIADY - FPAFY
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More