CIADY
Price
$18.21
Change
-$0.35 (-1.89%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.16B
RSGUF
Price
$4.59
Change
-$0.02 (-0.43%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
590.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIADY vs RSGUF

Header iconCIADY vs RSGUF Comparison
Open Charts CIADY vs RSGUFBanner chart's image
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$18.21
Change-$0.35 (-1.89%)
Volume$13.27K
Capitalization7.16B
Rogers Sugar
Price$4.59
Change-$0.02 (-0.43%)
Volume$25.12K
Capitalization590.55M
CIADY vs RSGUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIADY vs. RSGUF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIADY is a Hold and RSGUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CIADY: $18.21 vs. RSGUF: $4.59)
Brand notoriety: CIADY and RSGUF are both not notable
CIADY represents the Food: Major Diversified, while RSGUF is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIADY: 361% vs. RSGUF: 10%
Market capitalization -- CIADY: $7.16B vs. RSGUF: $590.55M
CIADY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $7.16B. RSGUF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $590.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.77B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $80.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.86B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $15.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIADY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSGUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIADY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSGUF is a better buy in the long-term than CIADY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIADY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSGUF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIADY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RSGUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CIADY and RSGUF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CIADY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -6.13% price change this week, while RSGUF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +184.24%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.98% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-3.18% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIADY($7.16B) has a higher market cap than RSGUF($591M). CIADY has higher P/E ratio than RSGUF: CIADY (509.41) vs RSGUF (12.97). RSGUF YTD gains are higher at: 12.225 vs. CIADY (-15.421). CIADY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.87B vs. RSGUF (145M). CIADY has higher revenues than RSGUF: CIADY (88.7B) vs RSGUF (1.3B).
CIADYRSGUFCIADY / RSGUF
Capitalization7.16B591M1,212%
EBITDA5.87B145M4,051%
Gain YTD-15.42112.225-126%
P/E Ratio509.4112.973,929%
Revenue88.7B1.3B6,844%
Total CashN/A26.6M-
Total DebtN/A381M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIADY vs RSGUF: Fundamental Ratings
CIADY
RSGUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6126
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
9452
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8349
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
166
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSGUF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (40). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADY (100). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADY (94). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADY (83). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSGUF (66). This means that CIADY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSGUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIADYRSGUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTSL45.81-0.07
-0.14%
First Trust Senior Loan ETF
LMUB49.87-0.09
-0.18%
iShares Long-Term National Muni Bd ETF
FNOV52.48-0.15
-0.29%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Nov
VPV10.48-0.05
-0.47%
Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust
FTXR34.60-0.37
-1.05%
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF

CIADY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIADY has been loosely correlated with TYCMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIADY jumps, then TYCMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADY
1D Price
Change %
CIADY100%
-1.89%
TYCMY - CIADY
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
WHGLY - CIADY
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
DAR - CIADY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
RSGUF - CIADY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
DANOY - CIADY
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
More

RSGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSGUF and LW have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSGUF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSGUF
1D Price
Change %
RSGUF100%
-0.43%
LW - RSGUF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
DAR - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
CIADY - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
SAPIF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
PRBZF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
More