CIADY
Price
$20.88
Change
+$0.11 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.88B
WHGLY
Price
$19.50
Change
+$0.20 (+1.04%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIADY vs WHGLY

Header iconCIADY vs WHGLY Comparison
Open Charts CIADY vs WHGLYBanner chart's image
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$20.88
Change+$0.11 (+0.53%)
Volume$2.22K
Capitalization14.88B
WH Group
Price$19.50
Change+$0.20 (+1.04%)
Volume$7.86K
Capitalization6.94B
CIADY vs WHGLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIADY vs. WHGLY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIADY is a Hold and WHGLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CIADY: $20.88 vs. WHGLY: $19.50)
Brand notoriety: CIADY and WHGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIADY: 73% vs. WHGLY: 11%
Market capitalization -- CIADY: $14.88B vs. WHGLY: $6.94B
CIADY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $14.88B. WHGLY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $6.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIADY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIADY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WHGLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHGLY is a better buy in the long-term than CIADY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIADY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIADY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WHGLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIADY is a better buy in the short-term than WHGLY.

Price Growth

CIADY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.48% price change this week, while WHGLY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIADY is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

WHGLY is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIADY($14.9B) has a higher market cap than WHGLY($6.94B). CIADY has higher P/E ratio than WHGLY: CIADY (19.12) vs WHGLY (4.96). WHGLY YTD gains are higher at: 38.255 vs. CIADY (-3.020). CIADY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.5B vs. WHGLY (3.1B). CIADY has higher revenues than WHGLY: CIADY (92.6B) vs WHGLY (28.1B).
CIADYWHGLYCIADY / WHGLY
Capitalization14.9B6.94B215%
EBITDA10.5B3.1B339%
Gain YTD-3.02038.255-8%
P/E Ratio19.124.96386%
Revenue92.6B28.1B330%
Total CashN/A1.39B-
Total DebtN/A3.9B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIADY vs WHGLY: Fundamental Ratings
CIADY
WHGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10039
SMR RATING
1..100
9392
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
193
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHGLY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADY (47). This means that WHGLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

WHGLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADY (100). This means that WHGLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

WHGLY's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (93). This means that WHGLY’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

WHGLY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (57). This means that WHGLY’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WHGLY (93). This means that CIADY’s stock grew significantly faster than WHGLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIADYWHGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQA44.830.40
+0.90%
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Drsy Wght Momt ETF
TMFS36.190.30
+0.84%
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
DTD80.930.44
+0.55%
WisdomTree US Total Dividend ETF
PFFV22.95N/A
N/A
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
HJUL23.78N/A
N/A
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buf ETF - Jul

CIADY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIADY has been loosely correlated with TYCMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIADY jumps, then TYCMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADY
1D Price
Change %
CIADY100%
+0.53%
TYCMY - CIADY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
WHGLY - CIADY
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
DAR - CIADY
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
RSGUF - CIADY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
DANOY - CIADY
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
More

WHGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHGLY has been loosely correlated with CIADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHGLY jumps, then CIADY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGLY
1D Price
Change %
WHGLY100%
+1.04%
CIADY - WHGLY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
TYCMY - WHGLY
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
ASBFY - WHGLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
USNA - WHGLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
LSF - WHGLY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
More