Ad is loading...
CIBCX vs FCGBX
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FCGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$72.85
Change+$0.12 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.59B
Templeton Global Balanced C
Price$2.55
Change+$0.02 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.22M
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FCGBX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Buy and FCGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FCGBX (292M). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FCGBX: CIBCX (2.40) vs FCGBX (1.73). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FCGBX: CIBCX (24 years) vs FCGBX (14 years). FCGBX (2.06) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.34). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FCGBX (43.31). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FCGBX (1000). CIBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.44 vs. FCGBX (4.84). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.69 vs. FCGBX (18.10).
| CIBCX | FCGBX | CIBCX / FCGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.97 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.06 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.706 | 6.751 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 292M | 37,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 1.73 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.44 | 4.84 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.31 | 16.27 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.69 | 18.10 | 241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.54 | -3.14 | -1,070% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...