Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FCGBX
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FCGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$79.95
Change+$0.11 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.05B
Templeton Global Dynamic Income C
Price$2.83
Change+$0.01 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.82M
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FCGBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Buy and FCGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 120B vs. FCGBX (314M). FCGBX pays higher dividends than CIBCX: FCGBX (2.42) vs CIBCX (2.20). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FCGBX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FCGBX (14 years). FCGBX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.34). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FCGBX (43.31). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FCGBX (1000). FCGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.92 vs. CIBCX (11.60). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.86 vs. FCGBX (25.08).
| CIBCX | FCGBX | CIBCX / FCGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.96 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.01 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.972 | 21.438 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120B | 314M | 38,217% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 2.42 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.60 | 14.92 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.96 | 49.97 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.86 | 25.08 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.86 | 17.91 | 318% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers