Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FCGBX
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FCGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$79.27
Change-$0.10 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.04B
Templeton Global Balanced C
Price$2.84
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets315.1M
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FCGBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a StrongBuy and FCGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 119B vs. FCGBX (315M). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FCGBX: CIBCX (2.23) vs FCGBX (1.79). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FCGBX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FCGBX (14 years). FCGBX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.34). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FCGBX (43.31). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FCGBX (1000). FCGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.32 vs. CIBCX (11.29). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. FCGBX (25.51).
| CIBCX | FCGBX | CIBCX / FCGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.96 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.01 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 20.908 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119B | 315M | 37,778% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 1.79 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.29 | 14.32 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.40 | 41.82 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.22 | 25.51 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.78 | 19.83 | 301% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement