Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FCGBX
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FCGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$79.24
Change-$0.18 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.1B
Templeton Global Dynamic Income C
Price$2.79
Change-$0.01 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets307.72M
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FCGBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and FCGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 119B vs. FCGBX (308M). FCGBX pays higher dividends than CIBCX: FCGBX (2.79) vs CIBCX (2.21). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FCGBX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FCGBX (14 years). FCGBX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.34). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FCGBX (43.31). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FCGBX (1000). FCGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.33 vs. CIBCX (12.25). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.16 vs. FCGBX (18.65).
| CIBCX | FCGBX | CIBCX / FCGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.96 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.01 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.933 | 21.049 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119B | 308M | 38,636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 2.79 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.25 | 17.33 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.05 | 40.66 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.16 | 18.65 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.74 | 16.34 | 341% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement