Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FCGBX
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FCGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$75.47
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.5B
Templeton Global Balanced C
Price$2.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.53M
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FCGBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Buy and FCGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. FCGBX (302M). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FCGBX: CIBCX (2.33) vs FCGBX (1.67). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FCGBX: CIBCX (24 years) vs FCGBX (14 years). FCGBX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.34). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FCGBX (43.31). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FCGBX (1000). CIBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.32 vs. FCGBX (8.98). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.05 vs. FCGBX (18.79).
| CIBCX | FCGBX | CIBCX / FCGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.96 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.01 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.464 | 10.970 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113B | 302M | 37,417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 1.67 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.32 | 8.98 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.97 | 15.06 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.05 | 18.79 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.51 | 1.97 | 2,110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement