Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FCGBX
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FCGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$78.67
Change+$0.11 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.97B
Templeton Global Balanced C
Price$2.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.5M
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FCGBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a StrongBuy and FCGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FCGBX (311M). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FCGBX: CIBCX (2.29) vs FCGBX (1.85). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FCGBX: CIBCX (24 years) vs FCGBX (14 years). FCGBX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.34). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FCGBX (43.31). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FCGBX (1000). FCGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.93 vs. CIBCX (10.34). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.11 vs. FCGBX (21.66).
| CIBCX | FCGBX | CIBCX / FCGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.96 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.01 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.650 | 17.928 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 311M | 37,942% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 1.85 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.34 | 11.93 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.49 | 32.28 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.11 | 21.66 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.35 | 15.31 | 368% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement