Ad is loading...
CIBCX vs FGGBX
CIBCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FGGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$72.85
Change+$0.12 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.59B
Templeton Global Balanced R6
Price$2.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.22M
CIBCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FGGBX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FGGBX (292M). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FGGBX: CIBCX (2.40) vs FGGBX (2.13). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIBCX (24 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). CIBCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.99). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). CIBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.44 vs. FGGBX (6.11). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.69 vs. FGGBX (24.20).
| CIBCX | FGGBX | CIBCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.91 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.99 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.706 | 7.143 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 292M | 37,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 2.13 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.44 | 6.11 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.31 | 19.89 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.69 | 24.20 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.54 | 5.44 | 616% |