Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FGGBX
CIBCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FGGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$79.24
Change-$0.18 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.1B
Templeton Global Dynamic Income R6
Price$2.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets307.72M
CIBCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FGGBX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and FGGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 119B vs. FGGBX (308M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than CIBCX: FGGBX (3.75) vs CIBCX (2.21). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FGGBX (13 years). CIBCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.96). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.63 vs. CIBCX (12.25). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.16 vs. FGGBX (24.59).
| CIBCX | FGGBX | CIBCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.89 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.96 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.933 | 22.049 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119B | 308M | 38,636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 3.75 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.25 | 18.63 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.05 | 45.37 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.16 | 24.59 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.74 | 26.99 | 207% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers