Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FGGBX
CIBCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FGGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$79.95
Change+$0.11 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.05B
Templeton Global Dynamic Income R6
Price$2.84
Change+$0.01 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.82M
CIBCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FGGBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 120B vs. FGGBX (314M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than CIBCX: FGGBX (3.30) vs CIBCX (2.20). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). CIBCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.96). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.09 vs. CIBCX (11.60). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.86 vs. FGGBX (31.65).
| CIBCX | FGGBX | CIBCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.89 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.96 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.972 | 22.334 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120B | 314M | 38,217% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 3.30 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.60 | 16.09 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.96 | 54.81 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.86 | 31.65 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.86 | 28.14 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement