Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FGGBX
CIBCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FGGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$77.57
Change+$0.33 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.29B
Templeton Global Balanced R6
Price$2.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.05M
CIBCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FGGBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 116B vs. FGGBX (306M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than CIBCX: FGGBX (2.62) vs CIBCX (2.29). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIBCX (24 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). CIBCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.96). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.09 vs. CIBCX (14.87). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.72 vs. FGGBX (27.65).
| CIBCX | FGGBX | CIBCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.89 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.96 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.047 | 15.923 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116B | 306M | 37,908% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 2.62 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.87 | 16.09 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.81 | 30.86 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.72 | 27.65 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.35 | 16.33 | 284% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement