Ad is loading...
CIBCX vs FGGBX
CIBCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FGGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$73.04
Change+$0.53 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.81B
Templeton Global Balanced R6
Price$2.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.06M
CIBCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FGGBX commentary
Mar 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a StrongBuy and FGGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FGGBX (298M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than CIBCX: FGGBX (4.03) vs CIBCX (2.54). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIBCX (24 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. FGGBX (61.11). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). CIBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.11 vs. FGGBX (8.91). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.64 vs. FGGBX (12.70).
| CIBCX | FGGBX | CIBCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.738 | 5.882 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 298M | 36,913% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 4.03 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | 8.91 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.49 | 9.67 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.64 | 12.70 | 265% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.42 | 7.22 | 449% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...