CIBEY
Price
$1.92
Change
+$0.03 (+1.59%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.93B
MZHOF
Price
$31.10
Change
-$1.98 (-5.99%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
81.62B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIBEY vs MZHOF

Header iconCIBEY vs MZHOF Comparison
Open Charts CIBEY vs MZHOFBanner chart's image
Commercial International Bank
Price$1.92
Change+$0.03 (+1.59%)
Volume$6.57K
Capitalization5.93B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$31.10
Change-$1.98 (-5.99%)
Volume$3
Capitalization81.62B
CIBEY vs MZHOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIBEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MZHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIBEY vs. MZHOF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBEY is a Hold and MZHOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CIBEY: $1.92 vs. MZHOF: $31.10)
Brand notoriety: CIBEY and MZHOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIBEY: 54% vs. MZHOF: 0%
Market capitalization -- CIBEY: $5.93B vs. MZHOF: $81.62B
CIBEY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.93B. MZHOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $81.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIBEY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMZHOF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CIBEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MZHOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MZHOF is a better buy in the long-term than CIBEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIBEY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MZHOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIBEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MZHOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MZHOF is a better buy in the short-term than CIBEY.

Price Growth

CIBEY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.13% price change this week, while MZHOF (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MZHOF($81.6B) has a higher market cap than CIBEY($5.93B). MZHOF has higher P/E ratio than CIBEY: MZHOF (13.08) vs CIBEY (5.16). CIBEY YTD gains are higher at: 40.254 vs. MZHOF (27.459). CIBEY has less debt than MZHOF: CIBEY (36.2B) vs MZHOF (22.19T). MZHOF has higher revenues than CIBEY: MZHOF (3.61T) vs CIBEY (99B).
CIBEYMZHOFCIBEY / MZHOF
Capitalization5.93B81.6B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD40.25427.459147%
P/E Ratio5.1613.0839%
Revenue99B3.61T3%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt36.2B22.19T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIBEY vs MZHOF: Fundamental Ratings
CIBEY
MZHOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
290
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8619
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7430
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MZHOF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBEY (97). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIBEY (86). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew significantly faster than CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBEY (1). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBEY (47). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIBEY (74). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBEYMZHOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIBEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MZHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGEBX82.25N/A
N/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
LAMYX25.21N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth I
KMDVX32.26N/A
N/A
Keeley Gabelli Mid Cap Dividend A
JOEIX13.92N/A
N/A
JOHCM Emerging Markets Opps Advisor
GGZPX24.32N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity P

CIBEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIBEY and CCRDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIBEY and CCRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIBEY
1D Price
Change %
CIBEY100%
+1.59%
CCRDF - CIBEY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MZHOF - CIBEY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - CIBEY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGMBF - CIBEY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - CIBEY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MZHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MZHOF and CCRDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MZHOF and CCRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MZHOF
1D Price
Change %
MZHOF100%
N/A
CCRDF - MZHOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBPA - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNCDY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
CIBEY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
ISTR - MZHOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
More