Ad is loading...
CIBFX vs FLFGX
CIBFX vs FLFGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBFX vs. FLFGX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBFX is a Buy and FLFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBFX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FLFGX (37M). CIBFX pays higher dividends than FLFGX: CIBFX (3.08) vs FLFGX (1.57). CIBFX was incepted earlier than FLFGX: CIBFX (24 years) vs FLFGX (19 years). FLFGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CIBFX (0.66). FLFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. CIBFX (56.00). CIBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLFGX: CIBFX (250) vs FLFGX (2500). CIBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.18 vs. FLFGX (-5.39). CIBFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.29 vs. FLFGX (22.78).
| CIBFX | FLFGX | CIBFX / FLFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.949 | 2.706 | 220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 37M | 297,297% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 1.57 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.18 | -5.39 | -189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.28 | 14.10 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.29 | 22.78 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.39 | 11.96 | 313% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...