Ad is loading...
CIBFX vs FSBCX
CIBFX vs FSBCX Comparison
Open Charts CIBFX vs FSBCX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr F1
Price$72.62
Change+$0.12 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.75B
Federated Hermes Global Allocation C
Price$19.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.71M
CIBFX vs FSBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBFX vs. FSBCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBFX is a Buy and FSBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBFX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FSBCX (266M). CIBFX pays higher dividends than FSBCX: CIBFX (3.08) vs FSBCX (1.34). CIBFX was incepted earlier than FSBCX: CIBFX (24 years) vs FSBCX (32 years). FSBCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than CIBFX (0.66). FSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. CIBFX (56.00). CIBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSBCX: CIBFX (250) vs FSBCX (1500). CIBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.18 vs. FSBCX (5.60). CIBFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.29 vs. FSBCX (15.47).
| CIBFX | FSBCX | CIBFX / FSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.95 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.20 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.949 | 1.223 | 487% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 266M | 41,353% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 1.34 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.18 | 5.60 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.28 | 16.84 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.29 | 15.47 | 306% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.39 | 14.20 | 263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...