CIBH
Price
$28.00
Change
+$0.75 (+2.75%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
33.63M
CMBNF
Price
$91.31
Change
+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.23B
Ad is loading...

CIBH vs CMBNF

Header iconCIBH vs CMBNF Comparison
Open Charts CIBH vs CMBNFBanner chart's image
CIB Marine Bancshares
Price$28.00
Change+$0.75 (+2.75%)
Volume$400
Capitalization33.63M
CEMBRA MONEY BK AG
Price$91.31
Change+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Volume$170
Capitalization2.23B
CIBH vs CMBNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIBH vs. CMBNF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBH is a Hold and CMBNF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CIBH: $28.00 vs. CMBNF: $91.31)
Brand notoriety: CIBH and CMBNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIBH: 28% vs. CMBNF: 25%
Market capitalization -- CIBH: $33.63M vs. CMBNF: $2.23B
CIBH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $33.63M. CMBNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIBH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMBNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CIBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMBNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMBNF is a better buy in the long-term than CIBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIBH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CIBH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CIBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.54% price change this week, while CMBNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIBH is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBNF($2.23B) has a higher market cap than CIBH($33.6M). CIBH has higher P/E ratio than CMBNF: CIBH (14.08) vs CMBNF (11.79). CIBH YTD gains are higher at: 4.167 vs. CMBNF (0.000). CIBH has less debt than CMBNF: CIBH (55.5M) vs CMBNF (3.1B). CMBNF has higher revenues than CIBH: CMBNF (512M) vs CIBH (29.5M).
CIBHCMBNFCIBH / CMBNF
Capitalization33.6M2.23B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.1670.000-
P/E Ratio14.0811.79119%
Revenue29.5M512M6%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt55.5M3.1B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIBH: Fundamental Ratings
CIBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71
SMR RATING
1..100
74
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
11

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBHCMBNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
27%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
36%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CIBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLPAX13.380.24
+1.83%
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity A
PFSZX24.990.25
+1.01%
PGIM Jennison Financial Services Z
CMLIX47.860.45
+0.95%
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
JEMOX30.840.17
+0.55%
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity R5
SLYCX14.840.08
+0.54%
SEI Large Cap Y (SIMT)

CIBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIBH and ANDC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIBH and ANDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIBH
1D Price
Change %
CIBH100%
+2.75%
ANDC - CIBH
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
CZBS - CIBH
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.39%
BSFO - CIBH
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
NACB - CIBH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMBNF - CIBH
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBNF has been loosely correlated with BLMIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBNF jumps, then BLMIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBNF
1D Price
Change %
CMBNF100%
N/A
BLMIF - CMBNF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STBK - CMBNF
34%
Loosely correlated
-10.42%
CBWA - CMBNF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
CNBB - CMBNF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
ALBKY - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More