Ad is loading...
CIBR vs FCLD
CIBR vs FCLD Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs FCLD
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$61.17
Change-$3.28 (-5.09%)
Volume$10.15K
Net Assets7.99B
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
Price$22.64
Change-$1.91 (-7.78%)
Volume$221
Net Assets79.63M
CIBR vs FCLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. FCLD commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and FCLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 7.99B vs. FCLD (79.6M). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than FCLD: CIBR (1.583) vs FCLD (-10.644). CIBR was incepted earlier than FCLD: CIBR (10 years) vs FCLD (3 years). FCLD (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). CIBR has a higher turnover FCLD (33.00) vs FCLD (33.00).
| CIBR | FCLD | CIBR / FCLD | |
| Gain YTD | 1.583 | -10.644 | -15% |
| Net Assets | 7.99B | 79.6M | 10,039% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.40 | 147% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 33.00 | 118% |
| Yield | 0.26 | 0.13 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | FCLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | +1.46% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 72% Closely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | +2.97% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 68% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| S - CIBR | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
More | ||||
FCLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCLD has been loosely correlated with INTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCLD jumps, then INTU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCLD | 100% | +1.95% | ||
| INTU - FCLD | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| GTLB - FCLD | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| PATH - FCLD | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.05% | ||
| MDB - FCLD | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| CRM - FCLD | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||