Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs IQM
CIBR vs IQM Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs IQM
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$73.41
Change+$0.18 (+0.25%)
Volume$1.45K
Net Assets11.08B
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
Price$84.61
Change+$0.86 (+1.03%)
Volume$108
Net Assets50.93M
CIBR vs IQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. IQM commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and IQM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11.1B vs. IQM (50.9M). IQM has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: IQM (25.281) vs CIBR (15.561). CIBR was incepted earlier than IQM: CIBR (10 years) vs IQM (6 years). IQM (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). IQM has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | IQM | CIBR / IQM | |
| Gain YTD | 15.561 | 25.281 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 50.9M | 21,807% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.50 | 118% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 44.12 | 88% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | IQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 17 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.72% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| FTNT - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | -2.18% | ||
More | ||||
IQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IQM and TER have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IQM and TER's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQM | 100% | -1.36% | ||
| TER - IQM | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
| RUN - IQM | 9% Poorly correlated | +3.50% | ||
| WOLF - IQM | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
| ENPH - IQM | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
| UBER - IQM | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
More | ||||