Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs IQM
CIBR vs IQM Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs IQM
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$71.98
Change+$0.25 (+0.35%)
Volume$573.09K
Net Assets10.22B
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
Price$79.85
Change-$0.62 (-0.77%)
Volume$3.72K
Net Assets44.22M
CIBR vs IQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. IQM commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and IQM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 10.2B vs. IQM (44.2M). IQM has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: IQM (19.453) vs CIBR (13.588). CIBR was incepted earlier than IQM: CIBR (10 years) vs IQM (5 years). IQM (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). IQM has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | IQM | CIBR / IQM | |
| Gain YTD | 13.588 | 19.453 | 70% |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 44.2M | 23,077% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.50 | 118% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 44.12 | 88% |
| Yield | 0.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | IQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 79% Closely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | +2.83% | ||
| AVGO - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
More | ||||
IQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IQM and ENR have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IQM and ENR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQM | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| ENR - IQM | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.80% | ||
| AAPL - IQM | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| FSLR - IQM | 14% Poorly correlated | +11.05% | ||
| BSY - IQM | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.75% | ||
| FTI - IQM | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
More | ||||