Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs IQM
CIBR vs IQM Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs IQM
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$72.40
Change-$0.71 (-0.97%)
Volume$711.32K
Net Assets9.63B
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
Price$69.82
Change-$0.96 (-1.36%)
Volume$1.54K
Net Assets31.83M
CIBR vs IQM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. IQM commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and IQM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 9.63B vs. IQM (31.8M). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than IQM: CIBR (14.113) vs IQM (4.442). CIBR was incepted earlier than IQM: CIBR (10 years) vs IQM (5 years). IQM (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). CIBR has a higher turnover IQM (11.93) vs IQM (11.93).
| CIBR | IQM | CIBR / IQM | |
| Gain YTD | 14.113 | 4.442 | 318% |
| Net Assets | 9.63B | 31.8M | 30,277% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.50 | 118% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 11.93 | 327% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.97% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 72% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| S - CIBR | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.52% | ||
More | ||||
IQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IQM has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IQM jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQM | 100% | -1.36% | ||
| VRT - IQM | 80% Closely correlated | -3.08% | ||
| MPWR - IQM | 79% Closely correlated | -6.34% | ||
| ANET - IQM | 79% Closely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| CLS - IQM | 75% Closely correlated | -4.13% | ||
| GEV - IQM | 74% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
More | ||||