CIBR | ITEQ | CIBR / ITEQ | |
Gain YTD | 13.588 | 3.049 | 446% |
Net Assets | 10.2B | 91.6M | 11,135% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
Turnover | 39.00 | 21.00 | 186% |
Yield | 0.26 | 0.01 | 2,367% |
Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
CIBR | ITEQ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago76% | 5 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 4 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago81% | 9 days ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR | 100% | +0.35% | ||
CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
PANW - CIBR | 79% Closely correlated | +2.04% | ||
ZS - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
NET - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | +2.83% | ||
AVGO - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ITEQ and NICE have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITEQ and NICE's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ITEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ | 100% | +1.36% | ||
NICE - ITEQ | 18% Poorly correlated | +4.15% | ||
SILC - ITEQ | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
CGNT - ITEQ | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
VRNT - ITEQ | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.47% | ||
PRTC - ITEQ | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.91% | ||
More |