Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs MAKX
CIBR vs MAKX Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs MAKX
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$75.56
Change+$0.97 (+1.30%)
Volume$6.34K
Net Assets9.87B
ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF
Price$45.89
Change+$0.09 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13M
CIBR vs MAKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. MAKX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and MAKX is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 9.87B vs. MAKX (1.14M). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than MAKX: CIBR (17.707) vs MAKX (11.228). CIBR was incepted earlier than MAKX: CIBR (10 years) vs MAKX (4 years). MAKX (0.58) and CIBR (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . CIBR has a higher turnover MAKX (32.00) vs MAKX (32.00).
| CIBR | MAKX | CIBR / MAKX | |
| Gain YTD | 17.707 | 11.228 | 158% |
| Net Assets | 9.87B | 1.14M | 869,163% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.58 | 102% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 32.00 | 122% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.20 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 72% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 71% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| S - CIBR | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
More | ||||
MAKX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAKX has been closely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAKX jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAKX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAKX | 100% | N/A | ||
| PATH - MAKX | 66% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| DDD - MAKX | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| ALGM - MAKX | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| CGNX - MAKX | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| ZBRA - MAKX | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||