Ad is loading...
CIBR vs MAKX
CIBR vs MAKX Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs MAKX
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$62.60
Change+$0.94 (+1.52%)
Volume$1.71K
Net Assets7.81B
ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF
Price$34.19
Change+$2.53 (+7.99%)
Volume$1.09K
Net Assets854.8K
CIBR vs MAKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. MAKX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and MAKX is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 7.81B vs. MAKX (855K). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than MAKX: CIBR (-2.815) vs MAKX (-16.950). CIBR was incepted earlier than MAKX: CIBR (10 years) vs MAKX (4 years). MAKX (0.58) and CIBR (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . CIBR has a higher turnover MAKX (32.00) vs MAKX (32.00).
| CIBR | MAKX | CIBR / MAKX | |
| Gain YTD | -2.815 | -16.950 | 17% |
| Net Assets | 7.81B | 855K | 913,684% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.58 | 102% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 32.00 | 122% |
| Yield | 0.26 | 0.22 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -2.61% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -6.27% | ||
| S - CIBR | 66% Loosely correlated | -7.01% | ||
More | ||||
MAKX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAKX has been closely correlated with EMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAKX jumps, then EMR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAKX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAKX | 100% | N/A | ||
| EMR - MAKX | 68% Closely correlated | -4.50% | ||
| PATH - MAKX | 66% Closely correlated | -4.06% | ||
| DDD - MAKX | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| ALGM - MAKX | 65% Loosely correlated | -6.07% | ||
| CGNX - MAKX | 65% Loosely correlated | -9.04% | ||
More | ||||