Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs NBDS
CIBR vs NBDS Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs NBDS
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$71.50
Change-$1.88 (-2.56%)
Volume$3.62K
Net Assets11.01B
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Price$35.80
Change+$0.78 (+2.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.14M
CIBR vs NBDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. NBDS commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and NBDS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11B vs. NBDS (28.1M). NBDS has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: NBDS (13.512) vs CIBR (12.831). CIBR was incepted earlier than NBDS: CIBR (10 years) vs NBDS (4 years). NBDS (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). NBDS has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | NBDS | CIBR / NBDS | |
| Gain YTD | 12.831 | 13.512 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 11B | 28.1M | 39,146% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.55 | 107% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 49.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | NBDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -2.56% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 83% Closely correlated | -4.14% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -3.70% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 81% Closely correlated | -7.42% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| FTNT - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
More | ||||
NBDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NBDS and GTM have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBDS and GTM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBDS | 100% | -3.54% | ||
| GTM - NBDS | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.37% | ||
| DOCN - NBDS | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.06% | ||
| ZBRA - NBDS | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| HEI - NBDS | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
| RDDT - NBDS | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
More | ||||