Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs NBDS
CIBR vs NBDS Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs NBDS
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$71.98
Change+$0.25 (+0.35%)
Volume$573.09K
Net Assets10.22B
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Price$34.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.26K
Net Assets27.05M
CIBR vs NBDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. NBDS commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and NBDS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 10.2B vs. NBDS (27.1M). NBDS has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: NBDS (16.711) vs CIBR (13.588). CIBR was incepted earlier than NBDS: CIBR (10 years) vs NBDS (3 years). NBDS (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). NBDS has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | NBDS | CIBR / NBDS | |
| Gain YTD | 13.588 | 16.711 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 27.1M | 37,638% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.55 | 107% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 49.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 0.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | NBDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 79% Closely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | +2.83% | ||
| AVGO - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
More | ||||
NBDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBDS has been loosely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NBDS jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBDS | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| HOOD - NBDS | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| ARM - NBDS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| AVGO - NBDS | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| NVMI - NBDS | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.08% | ||
| HUBS - NBDS | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||