Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs NBDS
CIBR vs NBDS Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs NBDS
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$78.17
Change+$1.93 (+2.53%)
Volume$8.67K
Net Assets11.29B
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Price$37.11
Change+$0.55 (+1.50%)
Volume$600
Net Assets28.73M
CIBR vs NBDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. NBDS commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and NBDS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11.3B vs. NBDS (28.7M). NBDS has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: NBDS (24.071) vs CIBR (20.311). CIBR was incepted earlier than NBDS: CIBR (10 years) vs NBDS (4 years). NBDS (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). NBDS has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | NBDS | CIBR / NBDS | |
| Gain YTD | 20.311 | 24.071 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 28.7M | 39,373% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.55 | 107% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 49.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | NBDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -4.09% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||
NBDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NBDS and ONTO have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBDS and ONTO's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBDS | 100% | N/A | ||
| ONTO - NBDS | 22% Poorly correlated | -7.01% | ||
| NVMI - NBDS | 15% Poorly correlated | -5.47% | ||
| ARM - NBDS | 14% Poorly correlated | +2.00% | ||
| GTM - NBDS | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
| NVDA - NBDS | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
More | ||||