Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs NBXG
CIBR vs NBXG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. NBXG commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and NBXG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11B vs. NBXG (1.27B). NBXG has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: NBXG (20.634) vs CIBR (15.798). CIBR was incepted earlier than NBXG: CIBR (10 years) vs NBXG (4 years). CIBR (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than NBXG (1.30). NBXG has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | NBXG | CIBR / NBXG | |
| Gain YTD | 15.798 | 20.634 | 77% |
| Net Assets | 11B | 1.27B | 867% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.30 | 45% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 56.00 | 70% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | NBXG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| FTNT - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
More | ||||
NBXG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NBXG and META have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBXG and META's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBXG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBXG | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| META - NBXG | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| MPWR - NBXG | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.23% | ||
| TSM - NBXG | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.60% | ||
| AMAT - NBXG | 11% Poorly correlated | +4.45% | ||
| ASML - NBXG | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.51% | ||
More | ||||