Advertisement
CIBR vs PANW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and PANW is a Buy.
PANW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CIBR | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CURE | 80.67 | 1.54 | +1.95% |
| Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3X ETF | |||
| SCHO | 24.42 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Schwab Short-Term US Treasury ETF™ | |||
| EAOA | 39.60 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Agrsv Allc ETF | |||
| ETJ | 8.99 | -0.05 | -0.55% |
| Eaton Vance Risk - Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund | |||
| ZVOL | 12.00 | -0.14 | -1.15% |
| 1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | |||
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 83% Closely correlated | -4.14% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| AVGO - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -3.65% | ||
More | ||||
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 70% Closely correlated | -4.14% | ||
| ZS - PANW | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| NOW - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| FTNT - PANW | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| CYBR - PANW | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||