CIBR | WFH | CIBR / WFH | |
Gain YTD | 21.037 | 13.475 | 156% |
Net Assets | 11.2B | 14.5M | 77,241% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.45 | 131% |
Turnover | 39.00 | N/A | - |
Yield | 0.23 | 1.05 | 22% |
Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
CIBR | WFH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 13 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago80% | 6 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR | 100% | -0.51% | ||
ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
NET - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | -3.51% | ||
CYBR - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that WFH and HUBS have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WFH and HUBS's prices will move in lockstep.