CICHY
Price
$19.59
Change
+$0.22 (+1.14%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
263.22B
48 days until earnings call
FANDF
Price
$4.21
Change
-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
22.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CICHY vs FANDF

Header iconCICHY vs FANDF Comparison
Open Charts CICHY vs FANDFBanner chart's image
China Construction Bank
Price$19.59
Change+$0.22 (+1.14%)
Volume$67.1K
Capitalization263.22B
Firstrand
Price$4.21
Change-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Volume$146
Capitalization22.76B
CICHY vs FANDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CICHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CICHY vs. FANDF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CICHY is a Buy and FANDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CICHY: $19.59 vs. FANDF: $4.22)
Brand notoriety: CICHY and FANDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CICHY: 104% vs. FANDF: 18%
Market capitalization -- CICHY: $263.22B vs. FANDF: $22.76B
CICHY [@Major Banks] is valued at $263.22B. FANDF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $22.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CICHY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFANDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CICHY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FANDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CICHY is a better buy in the long-term than FANDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CICHY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANDF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CICHY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FANDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CICHY is a better buy in the short-term than FANDF.

Price Growth

CICHY (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.45% price change this week, while FANDF (@Major Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

CICHY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CICHY($263B) has a higher market cap than FANDF($22.8B). FANDF has higher P/E ratio than CICHY: FANDF (10.50) vs CICHY (5.32). CICHY YTD gains are higher at: 27.583 vs. FANDF (5.375). FANDF has less debt than CICHY: FANDF (21.6B) vs CICHY (3.36T). CICHY has higher revenues than FANDF: CICHY (739B) vs FANDF (143B).
CICHYFANDFCICHY / FANDF
Capitalization263B22.8B1,154%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.5835.375513%
P/E Ratio5.3210.5051%
Revenue739B143B517%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.36T21.6B15,537%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CICHY vs FANDF: Fundamental Ratings
CICHY
FANDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6042
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1236
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1978
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CICHY's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (87). This means that CICHY’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

CICHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (36). This means that CICHY’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

CICHY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (1). This means that CICHY’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

CICHY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (57). This means that CICHY’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

CICHY's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANDF (78). This means that CICHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CICHYFANDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CICHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTCI59.020.71
+1.22%
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
WLDR35.650.23
+0.65%
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
KXI66.080.23
+0.35%
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
VYM139.550.26
+0.19%
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
FT7.94N/A
N/A
Franklin Universal Trust

CICHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CICHY has been closely correlated with IDCBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CICHY jumps, then IDCBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICHY
1D Price
Change %
CICHY100%
+1.14%
IDCBY - CICHY
91%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
BACHY - CICHY
82%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
ACGBY - CICHY
76%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
SCBFY - CICHY
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
HSBC - CICHY
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
More

FANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FANDF and NAUBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FANDF and NAUBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANDF
1D Price
Change %
FANDF100%
N/A
NAUBF - FANDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.52%
CMWAY - FANDF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
CICHY - FANDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
HBCYF - FANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
BNDSY - FANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.57%
More