Advertisement
CICOF vs CICOY
To understand the difference between Cosco Shipping Holdings Co Ltd - Ordinary Shares - Class H (CICOF) vs. Cosco Shipping Holdings Co Ltd - ADR (CICOY) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class H and ADR
Ordinary Shares - Class H - The Chinese stock markets have strict restrictions on who can buy and what is available to investors for purchase. Chinese H-shares represent the shares of publicly-traded incorporated Chinese companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and trade with a face value of Hong Kong dollars (HKD). Before 2007, H-shares were provided only for foreign investors. Since foreign investors trade H-shares, they have become more liquid in comparison to A-shares which represent publicly listed Chinese companies that trade on the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges in yuan renminbi (CNY). Thus, this resulted in A-shares being traded at a premium to H-shares of a similar company.
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CICOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCICOY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CICOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CICOY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CICOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CICOY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CICOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
- CICOY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CICOF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -7.89% price change this week, while CICOY (@Marine Shipping) price change was -1.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
CICOY is expected to report earnings on Aug 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (+2.09% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
| CICOF | CICOY | CICOF / CICOY | |
| Capitalization | 32.8B | 32.8B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 35.9B | 88.8B | 40% |
| Gain YTD | 6.707 | 23.045 | 29% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.08 | 4.30 | 95% |
| Revenue | 176B | 234B | 75% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
CICOF | CICOY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 22 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CICOF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOY (4). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to CICOY’s over the last 12 months.
CICOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (38). This means that CICOY’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.
CICOY's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CICOF (64). This means that CICOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CICOF’s over the last 12 months.
CICOY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (42). This means that CICOY’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.
CICOY's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (90). This means that CICOY’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.
| CICOF | CICOY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
CICOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CICOF and MPZZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICOF and MPZZF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CICOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CICOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MPZZF - CICOF | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.18% | ||
| AMKAF - CICOF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DSX - CICOF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.30% | ||
| KNOP - CICOF | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
| CICOY - CICOF | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||
CICOY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CICOY has been loosely correlated with OROVY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CICOY jumps, then OROVY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CICOY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CICOY | 100% | +1.10% | ||
| OROVY - CICOY | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HPGLY - CICOY | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ZIM - CICOY | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| MSLOY - CICOY | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
| NPNYY - CICOY | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||