CICOF
Price
$1.53
Change
-$0.12 (-7.27%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
29.4B
CSPKY
Price
$5.89
Change
+$0.28 (+4.99%)
Updated
Jan 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.19B
Ad is loading...

CICOF vs CSPKY

Header iconCICOF vs CSPKY Comparison
Open Charts CICOF vs CSPKYBanner chart's image
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
Price$1.53
Change-$0.12 (-7.27%)
Volume$400
Capitalization29.4B
COSCO SHIPPING Ports
Price$5.89
Change+$0.28 (+4.99%)
Volume$168
Capitalization2.19B
CICOF vs CSPKY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CICOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSPKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CICOF vs. CSPKY commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CICOF is a Hold and CSPKY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CICOF: $1.53 vs. CSPKY: $5.89)
Brand notoriety: CICOF and CSPKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CICOF: 23% vs. CSPKY: 78%
Market capitalization -- CICOF: $29.4B vs. CSPKY: $2.19B
CICOF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $29.4B. CSPKY’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $2.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CICOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSPKY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CICOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSPKY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CICOF is a better buy in the long-term than CSPKY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CICOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSPKY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CICOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CSPKY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSPKY is a better buy in the short-term than CICOF.

Price Growth

CICOF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -7.19% price change this week, while CSPKY (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.26% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CICOF($29.4B) has a higher market cap than CSPKY($2.19B). CSPKY has higher P/E ratio than CICOF: CSPKY (6.76) vs CICOF (4.51). CSPKY YTD gains are higher at: 10.507 vs. CICOF (-6.628). CICOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.9B vs. CSPKY (846M). CICOF has higher revenues than CSPKY: CICOF (176B) vs CSPKY (1.45B).
CICOFCSPKYCICOF / CSPKY
Capitalization29.4B2.19B1,341%
EBITDA35.9B846M4,243%
Gain YTD-6.62810.507-63%
P/E Ratio4.516.7667%
Revenue176B1.45B12,105%
Total CashN/A392M-
Total DebtN/A4.13B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CICOF vs CSPKY: Fundamental Ratings
CICOF
CSPKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34100
SMR RATING
1..100
6482
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CICOF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CSPKY (21). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to CSPKY’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSPKY (100). This means that CICOF’s stock grew significantly faster than CSPKY’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CSPKY (82). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to CSPKY’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CSPKY (47). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to CSPKY’s over the last 12 months.

CSPKY's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (70). This means that CSPKY’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CICOFCSPKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CICOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSPKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSQRX16.790.18
+1.08%
Invesco MSCI World SRI Index R
AGRFX112.651.06
+0.95%
AB Growth A
JIVRX31.090.15
+0.48%
JPMorgan U.S. Applied Data Sci Val R5
FRURX22.840.01
+0.04%
Franklin Utilities R
SLFYX7.82-0.01
-0.13%
SEI Multi-Asset Inflation Mgd Y (SIMT)

CICOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CICOF and MPZZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICOF and MPZZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICOF
1D Price
Change %
CICOF100%
N/A
MPZZF - CICOF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.19%
AMKAF - CICOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.23%
DSX - CICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
KNOP - CICOF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOY - CICOF
18%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More

CSPKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSPKY has been loosely correlated with PTAUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSPKY jumps, then PTAUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSPKY
1D Price
Change %
CSPKY100%
N/A
PTAUY - CSPKY
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMHHF - CSPKY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOY - CSPKY
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
CICOF - CSPKY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWLP - CSPKY
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.59%
More