CICOF
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.19 (-10.61%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
31.68B
CSPKY
Price
$6.60
Change
+$1.24 (+23.13%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
2.63B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CICOF vs CSPKY

Header iconCICOF vs CSPKY Comparison
Open Charts CICOF vs CSPKYBanner chart's image
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
Price$1.60
Change-$0.19 (-10.61%)
Volume$940
Capitalization31.68B
COSCO SHIPPING Ports
Price$6.60
Change+$1.24 (+23.13%)
Volume$600
Capitalization2.63B
CICOF vs CSPKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CICOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSPKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CICOF vs. CSPKY commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CICOF is a Hold and CSPKY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CICOF: $1.60 vs. CSPKY: $6.60)
Brand notoriety: CICOF and CSPKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CICOF: 26% vs. CSPKY: 68%
Market capitalization -- CICOF: $31.68B vs. CSPKY: $2.63B
CICOF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $31.68B. CSPKY’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $2.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $31.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CICOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSPKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CICOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSPKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSPKY is a better buy in the long-term than CICOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CICOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSPKY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CICOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • CSPKY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSPKY is a better buy in the short-term than CICOF.

Price Growth

CICOF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -5.65% price change this week, while CSPKY (@Marine Shipping) price change was +23.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+0.09% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CICOF($31.7B) has a higher market cap than CSPKY($2.63B). CSPKY has higher P/E ratio than CICOF: CSPKY (7.76) vs CICOF (3.74). CSPKY YTD gains are higher at: 28.282 vs. CICOF (-2.195). CICOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.9B vs. CSPKY (596M). CICOF has higher revenues than CSPKY: CICOF (176B) vs CSPKY (1.48B).
CICOFCSPKYCICOF / CSPKY
Capitalization31.7B2.63B1,205%
EBITDA35.9B596M6,023%
Gain YTD-2.19528.282-8%
P/E Ratio3.747.7648%
Revenue176B1.48B11,932%
Total CashN/A312M-
Total DebtN/A4.02B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CICOF vs CSPKY: Fundamental Ratings
CICOF
CSPKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2842
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4142
SMR RATING
1..100
6494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9731
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CICOF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CSPKY (28). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to CSPKY’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CSPKY (42). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to CSPKY’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CSPKY (94). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to CSPKY’s over the last 12 months.

CSPKY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (44). This means that CSPKY’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

CSPKY's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CICOF (97). This means that CSPKY’s stock grew significantly faster than CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CICOFCSPKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CICOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSPKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CISS3.640.13
+3.70%
C3is Inc
IONQ44.841.30
+2.99%
IonQ
GL121.601.70
+1.42%
Globe Life
UBCP14.050.03
+0.21%
United Bancorp
NTGR28.70-0.31
-1.07%
NETGEAR

CICOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CICOF and MPZZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICOF and MPZZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICOF
1D Price
Change %
CICOF100%
-10.39%
MPZZF - CICOF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
AMKAF - CICOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSX - CICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.43%
KNOP - CICOF
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
CICOY - CICOF
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
More

CSPKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSPKY has been loosely correlated with PTAUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSPKY jumps, then PTAUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSPKY
1D Price
Change %
CSPKY100%
N/A
PTAUY - CSPKY
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMHHF - CSPKY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOY - CSPKY
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
CICOF - CSPKY
2%
Poorly correlated
-10.39%
BWLP - CSPKY
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
More