Ad is loading...
CICOF
Price
$1.54
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
MPZZF
Price
$2.17
Change
+$0.05 (+2.36%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CICOF vs MPZZF

Header iconCICOF vs MPZZF Comparison
Open Charts CICOF vs MPZZFBanner chart's image
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
Price$1.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$215
CapitalizationN/A
MPC Container Ships AS
Price$2.17
Change+$0.05 (+2.36%)
Volume$12.25K
CapitalizationN/A
CICOF vs MPZZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CICOF vs. MPZZF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CICOF is a Buy and MPZZF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CICOF: $1.54 vs. MPZZF: $2.17)
Brand notoriety: CICOF and MPZZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CICOF: 14% vs. MPZZF: 74%
Market capitalization -- CICOF: $30.42B vs. MPZZF: $964.56M
CICOF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $30.42B. MPZZF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $964.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $31.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CICOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMPZZF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CICOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MPZZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than CICOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPZZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MPZZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CICOF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -1.91% price change this week, while MPZZF (@Marine Shipping) price change was +7.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.01% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CICOF($30.4B) has a higher market cap than MPZZF($965M). CICOF has higher P/E ratio than MPZZF: CICOF (4.47) vs MPZZF (3.95). MPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 73.890 vs. CICOF (54.000). CICOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.9B vs. MPZZF (359M). CICOF has higher revenues than MPZZF: CICOF (176B) vs MPZZF (627M).
CICOFMPZZFCICOF / MPZZF
Capitalization30.4B965M3,150%
EBITDA35.9B359M10,000%
Gain YTD54.00073.89073%
P/E Ratio4.473.95113%
Revenue176B627M28,070%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A167M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CICOF vs MPZZF: Fundamental Ratings
CICOF
MPZZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
6331
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
779
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPZZF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (11). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPZZF (100). This means that CICOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (63). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (46). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CICOF (77). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew significantly faster than CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPZZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ULE10.780.04
+0.42%
ProShares Ultra Euro
FXF100.050.35
+0.35%
Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc
AFK15.66-0.01
-0.06%
VanEck Africa ETF
ISCF32.94-0.05
-0.17%
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Mltfct ETF
ITB117.72-1.20
-1.01%
iShares US Home Construction ETF

CICOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CICOF and MPZZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICOF and MPZZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICOF
1D Price
Change %
CICOF100%
N/A
MPZZF - CICOF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
AMKAF - CICOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSX - CICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
KNOP - CICOF
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
CICOY - CICOF
18%
Poorly correlated
+2.93%
More

MPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPZZF has been loosely correlated with HPGLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPZZF jumps, then HPGLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPZZF
1D Price
Change %
MPZZF100%
+2.36%
HPGLY - MPZZF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMKBY - MPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
SBLK - MPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
HAFN - MPZZF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
HLAGF - MPZZF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
More