CIFR vs SEM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIFR is a Hold and SEM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CIFR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSEM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CIFR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CIFR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CIFR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CIFR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.60% price change this week, while SEM (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -17.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +109.01%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.85%.
Reported Earning Dates
CIFR is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
SEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.89% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.58% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| CIFR | SEM | CIFR / SEM | |
| Capitalization | 1.45B | 3.87B | 37% |
| EBITDA | 39.7M | 790M | 5% |
| Gain YTD | -31.897 | -24.089 | 132% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.57 | - |
| Revenue | 127M | 6.66B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 86.1M | 143M | 60% |
| Total Debt | 22M | 4.96B | 0% |
SEM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CIFR | SEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 86% | 27 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 69% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFAR | 23.68 | 0.29 | +1.24% |
| Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | |||
| BAPR | 42.75 | 0.38 | +0.90% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Apr | |||
| CADUSD | 0.72 | N/A | N/A |
| Canadian Dollar - United States Dollar | |||
| RTITX | 11.10 | N/A | N/A |
| Russell Inv Multifactor Intl Eq M | |||
| GBPCAD | 1.84 | N/A | N/A |
| United Kingdom Pound - Canadian Dollar | |||
CIFR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIFR has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIFR jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIFR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIFR | 100% | +1.44% | ||
| RIOT - CIFR | 81% Closely correlated | +7.98% | ||
| CLSK - CIFR | 77% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| HUT - CIFR | 76% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| BITF - CIFR | 76% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| WULF - CIFR | 74% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
More | ||||
SEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEM has been loosely correlated with ENSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEM jumps, then ENSG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEM | 100% | -21.82% | ||
| ENSG - SEM | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| USPH - SEM | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| EHC - SEM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| THC - SEM | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| BKD - SEM | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||