This stock comparison examines two companies that have traveled a similar path: both began as Bitcoin miners and are now repositioning themselves as suppliers of power and data-center capacity for artificial intelligence. CIFR (Cipher Digital Inc., formerly Cipher Mining) and HUT (Hut 8 Corp.) are increasingly evaluated not on cryptocurrency prices but on their ability to convert land, power access, and energy infrastructure into long-term AI hosting contracts. For traders and investors tracking the AI-infrastructure trade, comparing these two names offers a useful lens on relative performance, market positioning, and the trade-offs between contracted backlog and execution risk.
Cipher Digital operates industrial-scale data centers in the United States and has been winding down its Bitcoin mining operations in favor of HPC hosting. In recent weeks, the company extended the lease at its Barber Lake facility in Texas to 20 years, lifting contracted revenue at that single site above $9 billion, while its broader contracted revenue has climbed to roughly $11.4 billion across a pipeline of about 4.4 gigawatts (GW) of potential capacity. The company has also signed a separate 15-year hosting agreement with Amazon Web Services tied to its Black Pearl project.
Despite this deal flow, CIFR shares have shown choppy near-term behavior, with the stock trading well below its 52-week high amid valuation concerns. Analysts have flagged that the company trades at a premium on a price-to-sales basis relative to peers, reflecting expectations for future HPC cash flows rather than current mining revenue. Recent quarters still show revenue concentrated in Bitcoin mining, with deeper losses than expected, underscoring that the AI pivot remains a work in progress. Sentiment has been shaped by the tension between a growing contracted backlog and the financing and construction risks that come with it.
Hut 8 Corp. describes itself as an energy infrastructure platform integrating power, digital infrastructure, and compute. The company has secured roughly 949 megawatts (MW) of contracted AI capacity across its Beacon Point campus in Texas and River Bend campus in Louisiana, with an aggregate base-term contract value near $26.6 billion and more than $7.5 billion in project financing. Its development pipeline has been reported at around 8.66 GW, and it recently acquired two Texas data-center sites from the bankrupt miner Poolin for $140 million.
HUT has delivered strong trailing 12-month and year-to-date gains, though its share price remains highly volatile, with a beta far above the broader market. Recent quarterly results showed revenue growth of roughly 81% year over year, but the company swung to a net loss driven in part by unrealized losses on digital assets. Wall Street coverage has been broadly constructive, with several firms initiating or reaffirming buy ratings and price targets above recent levels, while the stock continues to face scrutiny over construction timelines and persistent GAAP losses.
For investors who prefer a systematic approach to this kind of relative comparison, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and set of covered symbols. Because not every bot suits every market condition, only those currently performing best and most aligned with prevailing conditions earn a place in the curated Trending AI Robots section. Exploring this page can help traders identify signal-based strategies matched to names like CIFR and HUT.
Although both companies occupy the same emerging category, their market positioning differs in scale and structure. HUT commands a larger market capitalization, a broader contracted backlog, and a more diversified development pipeline spanning multiple states, which has translated into more consistent trailing momentum and wider analyst coverage. CIFR, by contrast, has concentrated its story around a smaller number of high-value sites, giving it a more leveraged profile to individual contract wins but also greater sensitivity to any single project's delays or cost overruns.
On growth drivers, both depend on converting power access into leased HPC capacity, but HUT has been further along in monetizing multiple routes across its asset base, including residual Bitcoin operations and managed infrastructure. Risk profiles also differ: CIFR faces a heavier debt and financing burden relative to its earlier-stage revenue base, while HUT contends with a high beta and recurring unrealized digital-asset losses. Sector exposure is broadly similar, tying both names to AI infrastructure demand, power availability, and Bitcoin price swings.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, breadth of contracted backlog, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor HUT at present. Its larger contracted AI capacity, more diversified pipeline, stronger trailing relative performance, and broader analyst support suggest a steadier trend profile than CIFR, whose more concentrated project base and premium valuation introduce higher variance. That said, the assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive: both stocks remain tied to execution milestones, and any change in financing conditions, construction timelines, or Bitcoin prices could shift the relative outlook quickly.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CIFR turned positive on November 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where CIFR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 48 of 53 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where CIFR's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 19 of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 52 of 63 cases where CIFR's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
Following a +22.70% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CIFR advanced for three days, in 237 of 266 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
CIFR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CIFR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
The Aroon Indicator for CIFR entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 7 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 51 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.833) is normal, around the industry mean (2.898). P/E Ratio (-2.288) is within average values for comparable stocks, (18.492). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (2.284). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.224) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (35.088) is also within normal values, averaging (139.965).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. CIFR’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CIFR’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 99 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
HUT moved below its 50-day moving average on October 07, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 43 of 47 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The 10-day moving average for HUT crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 17 of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
The 50-day moving average for HUT moved below the 200-day moving average on November 04, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HUT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
The Aroon Indicator for HUT entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where HUT's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 24 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 58 of 68 cases where HUT's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
Following a +24.09% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HUT advanced for three days, in 267 of 292 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
HUT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. HUT’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 92 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.498) is normal, around the industry mean (3.120). P/E Ratio (-9.750) is within average values for comparable stocks, (6.734). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.060) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (8.976) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (31.348) is also within normal values, averaging (16.899).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HUT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
CIFR | HUT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 22 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CIFR's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUT (92). This means that CIFR’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUT’s over the last 12 months.
CIFR's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as HUT (97). This means that CIFR’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.
HUT's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CIFR (99). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to CIFR’s over the last 12 months.
HUT's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as CIFR (94). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to CIFR’s over the last 12 months.
CIFR's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUT (98). This means that CIFR’s stock grew significantly faster than HUT’s over the last 12 months.
| CIFR | HUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CIFR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while HUT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CIFR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CIFR (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -19.58% price change this week, while HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -10.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.23%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -23.03%.
CIFR is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2027.
HUT is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2027.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.40% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIFR has been closely correlated with IREN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIFR jumps, then IREN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIFR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIFR | 100% | -4.11% | ||
| IREN - CIFR | 80% Closely correlated | -7.85% | ||
| HUT - CIFR | 80% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| KEEL - CIFR | 79% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| APLD - CIFR | 78% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| RIOT - CIFR | 78% Closely correlated | +2.38% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUT | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| CLSK - HUT | 79% Closely correlated | -4.92% | ||
| WULF - HUT | 79% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| CIFR - HUT | 79% Closely correlated | -4.11% | ||
| RIOT - HUT | 77% Closely correlated | +2.38% | ||
| IREN - HUT | 75% Closely correlated | -7.85% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CMAY | 26.08 | N/A | N/A |
| Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF (CMAY) | |||
| SEIE | 35.82 | -0.13 | -0.37% |
| SEI Select International Equity ETF (SEIE) | |||
| CAFX | 24.15 | -0.11 | -0.45% |
| Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX) | |||
| RNRG | 31.62 | -0.29 | -0.91% |
| Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) | |||
| AOTG | 57.59 | -0.64 | -1.09% |
| AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) | |||