Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIGCX vs RERCX
CIGCX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts CIGCX vs RERCX
Calamos International Growth C
Price$18.44
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets264.87M
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$59.01
Change+$0.18 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.45B
CIGCX vs RERCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIGCX vs. RERCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIGCX is a Buy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. CIGCX (265M). RERCX pays higher dividends than CIGCX: RERCX (0.78) vs CIGCX (0.00). CIGCX was incepted earlier than RERCX: CIGCX (20 years) vs RERCX (23 years). CIGCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RERCX (1.12). CIGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 127.00 vs. RERCX (30.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIGCX: RERCX (250) vs CIGCX (2500). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.42 vs. CIGCX (1.43). RERCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.00 vs. CIGCX (3.19).
| CIGCX | RERCX | CIGCX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.12 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.12 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.371 | 13.133 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.78 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.43 | 2.42 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.39 | 16.00 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.19 | 17.00 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.08 | 24.20 | 46% |