Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIGEX vs NPFCX
CIGEX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CIGEX vs NPFCX
Calamos Global Equity I
Price$19.47
Change-$0.14 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.49M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$65.31
Change+$0.11 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.34B
CIGEX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIGEX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIGEX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. CIGEX (148M). CIGEX (0.00) and NPFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CIGEX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CIGEX (18 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CIGEX (1.17). CIGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIGEX: NPFCX (250) vs CIGEX (1000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.65 vs. CIGEX (-0.05). CIGEX return over 5 years is better than : 41.84 vs. NPFCX (35.93).
| CIGEX | NPFCX | CIGEX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.48 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.48 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.067 | 12.798 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.05 | 8.65 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.57 | 43.50 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.84 | 35.93 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.41 | 74.03 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement