Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIGIX vs RERCX
CIGIX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts CIGIX vs RERCX
Calamos International Growth I
Price$24.52
Change+$0.10 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.35M
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$58.35
Change+$0.13 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.65B
CIGIX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIGIX vs. RERCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIGIX is a Buy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. CIGIX (266M). RERCX pays higher dividends than CIGIX: RERCX (0.50) vs CIGIX (0.00). CIGIX was incepted earlier than RERCX: CIGIX (20 years) vs RERCX (23 years). CIGIX (1.15) and RERCX (1.12) have similar cost to investors . CIGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 127.00 vs. RERCX (35.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIGIX: RERCX (250) vs CIGIX (1000000). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. CIGIX (0.91). RERCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.57 vs. CIGIX (10.46).
| CIGIX | RERCX | CIGIX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.12 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.12 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.606 | 11.867 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.91 | 1.54 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.73 | 29.06 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.46 | 11.57 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.39 | 20.49 | 158% |