Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIHCX vs HFQRX
CIHCX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIHCX vs HFQRX
Cullen International High Dividend C
Price$12.83
Change-$0.10 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets366.13M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.14
Change-$0.01 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
CIHCX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIHCX vs. HFQRX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIHCX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.62B vs. CIHCX (366M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIHCX: HFQRX (7.21) vs CIHCX (3.11). CIHCX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIHCX (20 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CIHCX (2.23) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CIHCX (70.00). CIHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: CIHCX (1000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.64 vs. CIHCX (15.98). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 72.97 vs. CIHCX (61.62).
| CIHCX | HFQRX | CIHCX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.70 | 286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 0.70 | 319% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.683 | 23.193 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 366M | 6.62B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 7.21 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.98 | 20.64 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.21 | 56.79 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.62 | 72.97 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement