CIHHF
Price
$6.50
Change
+$1.41 (+27.70%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
125.76B
DSFGY
Price
$9.15
Change
-$1.50 (-14.08%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
788.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIHHF vs DSFGY

Header iconCIHHF vs DSFGY Comparison
Open Charts CIHHF vs DSFGYBanner chart's image
China Merchants Bank
Price$6.50
Change+$1.41 (+27.70%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization125.76B
Dah Sing Financial Holdings
Price$9.15
Change-$1.50 (-14.08%)
Volume$1.29K
Capitalization788.56M
CIHHF vs DSFGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIHHF vs. DSFGY commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIHHF is a Hold and DSFGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CIHHF: $6.50 vs. DSFGY: $8.24)
Brand notoriety: CIHHF and DSFGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIHHF: 188% vs. DSFGY: 100%
Market capitalization -- CIHHF: $125.76B vs. DSFGY: $788.56M
CIHHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $125.76B. DSFGY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $788.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIHHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDSFGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CIHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DSFGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DSFGY is a better buy in the long-term than CIHHF.

Price Growth

CIHHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DSFGY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIHHF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

DSFGY is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIHHF($126B) has a higher market cap than DSFGY($789M). CIHHF has higher P/E ratio than DSFGY: CIHHF (6.19) vs DSFGY (5.77). CIHHF YTD gains are higher at: 38.593 vs. DSFGY (-12.019). CIHHF has higher revenues than DSFGY: CIHHF (341B) vs DSFGY (7.25B).
CIHHFDSFGYCIHHF / DSFGY
Capitalization126B789M15,970%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.593-12.019-321%
P/E Ratio6.195.77107%
Revenue341B7.25B4,702%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt524BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIHHF vs DSFGY: Fundamental Ratings
CIHHF
DSFGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4994
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7146
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1648
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSFGY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIHHF (46). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIHHF’s over the last 12 months.

DSFGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHHF (71). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew similarly to CIHHF’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as DSFGY (7). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to DSFGY’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as DSFGY (61). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to DSFGY’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as DSFGY (48). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to DSFGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMLAX58.700.43
+0.74%
American Funds American Mutual 529A
ARSIX15.84N/A
N/A
AMG River Road Small Cap Value I
NWHDX14.61N/A
N/A
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val A
EMGDX30.43N/A
N/A
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity R6
SGGCX59.71N/A
N/A
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth C

CIHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIHHF has been loosely correlated with CAIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIHHF jumps, then CAIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIHHF
1D Price
Change %
CIHHF100%
N/A
CAIB - CIHHF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CIHKY - CIHHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
SBGOF - CIHHF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOF - CIHHF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSNGY - CIHHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
More

DSFGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSFGY and BKQNF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSFGY and BKQNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSFGY
1D Price
Change %
DSFGY100%
N/A
BKQNF - DSFGY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBJF - DSFGY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - DSFGY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSNGY - DSFGY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
OFED - DSFGY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More