CIHHF
Price
$4.46
Change
-$0.52 (-10.44%)
Updated
Jan 10 closing price
Capitalization
125.76B
DSFGY
Price
$10.40
Change
+$0.37 (+3.69%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
788.56M
Ad is loading...

CIHHF vs DSFGY

Header iconCIHHF vs DSFGY Comparison
Open Charts CIHHF vs DSFGYBanner chart's image
China Merchants Bank
Price$4.46
Change-$0.52 (-10.44%)
Volume$5.25K
Capitalization125.76B
Dah Sing Financial Holdings
Price$10.40
Change+$0.37 (+3.69%)
Volume$901
Capitalization788.56M
CIHHF vs DSFGY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DSFGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIHHF vs. DSFGY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIHHF is a Hold and DSFGY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CIHHF: $4.46 vs. DSFGY: $10.40)
Brand notoriety: CIHHF and DSFGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIHHF: 2% vs. DSFGY: 95%
Market capitalization -- CIHHF: $125.76B vs. DSFGY: $788.56M
CIHHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $125.76B. DSFGY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $788.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIHHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDSFGY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CIHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DSFGY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, DSFGY is a better buy in the long-term than CIHHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIHHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DSFGY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIHHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DSFGY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIHHF is a better buy in the short-term than DSFGY.

Price Growth

CIHHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DSFGY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIHHF($126B) has a higher market cap than DSFGY($789M). CIHHF has higher P/E ratio than DSFGY: CIHHF (6.19) vs DSFGY (5.77). DSFGY YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CIHHF (-4.904). CIHHF has higher revenues than DSFGY: CIHHF (341B) vs DSFGY (7.25B).
CIHHFDSFGYCIHHF / DSFGY
Capitalization126B789M15,970%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.9040.000-
P/E Ratio6.195.77107%
Revenue341B7.25B4,702%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt524BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIHHF vs DSFGY: Fundamental Ratings
CIHHF
DSFGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10054
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3826
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSFGY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHHF (24). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew similarly to CIHHF’s over the last 12 months.

DSFGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIHHF (100). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIHHF’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as DSFGY (7). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to DSFGY’s over the last 12 months.

DSFGY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHHF (56). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew similarly to CIHHF’s over the last 12 months.

DSFGY's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHHF (38). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew similarly to CIHHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIHHFDSFGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
42%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CIHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DSFGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGLD1.260.22
+21.15%
Nevada Canyon Gold Corp
ABBNY55.230.83
+1.53%
ABB Ltd.
FUJIY10.510.14
+1.35%
FUJIFILM Holdings Corp.
FBAK221.90-0.08
-0.03%
First National Bank Alaska
JPXGY10.68-0.04
-0.37%
Japan Exchange Group, Inc.

CIHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIHHF has been loosely correlated with CAIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIHHF jumps, then CAIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIHHF
1D Price
Change %
CIHHF100%
N/A
CAIB - CIHHF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CIHKY - CIHHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
SBGOF - CIHHF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOF - CIHHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+12.70%
HSNGY - CIHHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
More

DSFGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSFGY and BKQNF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSFGY and BKQNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSFGY
1D Price
Change %
DSFGY100%
N/A
BKQNF - DSFGY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBJF - DSFGY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - DSFGY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSNGY - DSFGY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
OFED - DSFGY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More