CIHHF
Price
$6.50
Change
+$1.41 (+27.70%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
152.19B
FNFI
Price
$8.73
Change
+$0.33 (+3.93%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.72M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIHHF vs FNFI

Header iconCIHHF vs FNFI Comparison
Open Charts CIHHF vs FNFIBanner chart's image
China Merchants Bank
Price$6.50
Change+$1.41 (+27.70%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization152.19B
First Niles Financial
Price$8.73
Change+$0.33 (+3.93%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization9.72M
CIHHF vs FNFI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNFI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIHHF vs. FNFI commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIHHF is a Hold and FNFI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CIHHF: $6.50 vs. FNFI: $8.73)
Brand notoriety: CIHHF and FNFI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIHHF: 100% vs. FNFI: 582%
Market capitalization -- CIHHF: $152.19B vs. FNFI: $9.72M
CIHHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $152.19B. FNFI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIHHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNFI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CIHHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNFI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIHHF is a better buy in the long-term than FNFI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNFI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FNFI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CIHHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FNFI (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.26% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIHHF($152B) has a higher market cap than FNFI($9.72M). FNFI has higher P/E ratio than CIHHF: FNFI (13.65) vs CIHHF (8.26). CIHHF YTD gains are higher at: 38.593 vs. FNFI (6.123). FNFI has less debt than CIHHF: FNFI (30.1M) vs CIHHF (438B). CIHHF has higher revenues than FNFI: CIHHF (332B) vs FNFI (8M).
CIHHFFNFICIHHF / FNFI
Capitalization152B9.72M1,563,304%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.5936.123630%
P/E Ratio8.2613.6561%
Revenue332B8M4,150,519%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt438B30.1M1,455,150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIHHF vs FNFI: Fundamental Ratings
CIHHF
FNFI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4949
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNFI's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHHF (57). This means that FNFI’s stock grew similarly to CIHHF’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as FNFI (100). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to FNFI’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FNFI (100). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to FNFI’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FNFI (52). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to FNFI’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FNFI (100). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to FNFI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIHHFFNFI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNFI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BQ2.860.08
+2.88%
Boqii Holding Limited
ESGL2.680.01
+0.46%
ESGL Holdings Limited
CLSK9.55-0.03
-0.31%
CleanSpark
NWSA29.48-0.18
-0.61%
News Corp
MAX10.28-0.09
-0.87%
MediaAlpha

CIHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIHHF has been loosely correlated with CAIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIHHF jumps, then CAIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIHHF
1D Price
Change %
CIHHF100%
N/A
CAIB - CIHHF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CIHKY - CIHHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
SBGOF - CIHHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
MTPOF - CIHHF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
HSNGY - CIHHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
More

FNFI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNFI and CIHHF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNFI and CIHHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNFI
1D Price
Change %
FNFI100%
N/A
CIHHF - FNFI
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNRN - FNFI
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
FMCB - FNFI
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
FKYS - FNFI
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
FMBL - FNFI
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More