CIHHF
Price
$5.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
HSNGY
Price
$13.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CIHHF vs HSNGY

Header iconCIHHF vs HSNGY Comparison
Open Charts CIHHF vs HSNGYBanner chart's image
China Merchants Bank
Price$5.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$120
CapitalizationN/A
Hang Seng Bank
Price$13.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.86K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CIHHF vs HSNGY Comparison Chart
Loading...
HSNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CIHHF vs. HSNGY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIHHF is a Hold and HSNGY is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CIHHF: $5.02 vs. HSNGY: $12.31)
Brand notoriety: CIHHF and HSNGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIHHF: 145% vs. HSNGY: 77%
Market capitalization -- CIHHF: $125.76B vs. HSNGY: $28.37B
CIHHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $125.76B. HSNGY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $28.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIHHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHSNGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HSNGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIHHF is a better buy in the long-term than HSNGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HSNGY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HSNGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CIHHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.02% price change this week, while HSNGY (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

HSNGY is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIHHF($126B) has a higher market cap than HSNGY($28.4B). HSNGY has higher P/E ratio than CIHHF: HSNGY (15.92) vs CIHHF (6.19). CIHHF YTD gains are higher at: 57.862 vs. HSNGY (13.442). CIHHF has higher revenues than HSNGY: CIHHF (341B) vs HSNGY (53.2B).
CIHHFHSNGYCIHHF / HSNGY
Capitalization126B28.4B444%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD57.86213.442430%
P/E Ratio6.1915.9239%
Revenue341B53.2B641%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt524BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIHHF vs HSNGY: Fundamental Ratings
CIHHF
HSNGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9067
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95100
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7465
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIHHF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HSNGY (74). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HSNGY’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGY (100). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to HSNGY’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGY (2). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to HSNGY’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGY (54). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to HSNGY’s over the last 12 months.

HSNGY's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHHF (74). This means that HSNGY’s stock grew similarly to CIHHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HSNGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HSNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

CIHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIHHF has been loosely correlated with CAIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIHHF jumps, then CAIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIHHF
1D Price
Change %
CIHHF100%
-4.02%
CAIB - CIHHF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CIHKY - CIHHF
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.53%
MTPOF - CIHHF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSNGY - CIHHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
SBGOF - CIHHF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HSNGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSNGY has been closely correlated with BHKLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HSNGY jumps, then BHKLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSNGY
1D Price
Change %
HSNGY100%
+1.82%
BHKLY - HSNGY
68%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
CIHKY - HSNGY
60%
Loosely correlated
+5.53%
BNPQY - HSNGY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
CIHHF - HSNGY
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.02%
SGBLY - HSNGY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
More