CIHKY
Price
$29.69
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
FBPI
Price
$11.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
14 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CIHKY vs FBPI

Header iconCIHKY vs FBPI Comparison
Open Charts CIHKY vs FBPIBanner chart's image
China Merchants Bank
Price$29.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$258.6K
CapitalizationN/A
First Bancorp of Indiana
Price$11.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CIHKY vs FBPI Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIHKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CIHKY vs. FBPI commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIHKY is a StrongSell and FBPI is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CIHKY: $24.67 vs. FBPI: $10.00)
Brand notoriety: CIHKY and FBPI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIHKY: 289% vs. FBPI: 13%
Market capitalization -- CIHKY: $125.76B vs. FBPI: $18.5M
CIHKY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $125.76B. FBPI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIHKY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFBPI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIHKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FBPI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIHKY is a better buy in the long-term than FBPI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIHKY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CIHKY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CIHKY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.25% price change this week, while FBPI (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBPI is expected to report earnings on Nov 01, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIHKY($126B) has a higher market cap than FBPI($18.5M). CIHKY YTD gains are higher at: 50.841 vs. FBPI (-26.909). CIHKY has higher revenues than FBPI: CIHKY (341B) vs FBPI (9.84M).
CIHKYFBPICIHKY / FBPI
Capitalization126B18.5M681,081%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD50.841-26.909-189%
P/E Ratio6.34N/A-
Revenue341B9.84M3,464,391%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A101M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIHKY vs FBPI: Fundamental Ratings
CIHKY
FBPI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1682
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72100
SMR RATING
1..100
163
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3882
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4681
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBPI's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHKY (29). This means that FBPI’s stock grew similarly to CIHKY’s over the last 12 months.

CIHKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as FBPI (100). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew similarly to FBPI’s over the last 12 months.

CIHKY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBPI (63). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBPI’s over the last 12 months.

CIHKY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBPI (82). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBPI’s over the last 12 months.

CIHKY's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBPI (81). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBPI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIHKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CIHKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

CIHKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIHKY has been loosely correlated with HSNGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIHKY jumps, then HSNGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIHKY
1D Price
Change %
CIHKY100%
-4.19%
HSNGY - CIHKY
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
BHKLY - CIHKY
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
VBFC - CIHKY
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSTVY - CIHKY
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - CIHKY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FBPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBPI and NCXS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBPI and NCXS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBPI
1D Price
Change %
FBPI100%
N/A
NCXS - FBPI
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
CIHKY - FBPI
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.19%
FBSI - FBPI
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FETM - FBPI
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCOB - FBPI
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
More