CIHKY
Price
$31.74
Change
+$0.35 (+1.12%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
155.41B
MTPOF
Price
$1.34
Change
-$0.03 (-2.19%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIHKY vs MTPOF

Header iconCIHKY vs MTPOF Comparison
Open Charts CIHKY vs MTPOFBanner chart's image
China Merchants Bank
Price$31.74
Change+$0.35 (+1.12%)
Volume$20.44K
Capitalization155.41B
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
Price$1.34
Change-$0.03 (-2.19%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization5.6B
CIHKY vs MTPOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIHKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIHKY vs. MTPOF commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIHKY is a StrongBuy and MTPOF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CIHKY: $31.74 vs. MTPOF: $1.34)
Brand notoriety: CIHKY and MTPOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIHKY: 105% vs. MTPOF: 42%
Market capitalization -- CIHKY: $155.41B vs. MTPOF: $5.6B
CIHKY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $155.41B. MTPOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIHKY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTPOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIHKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIHKY is a better buy in the long-term than MTPOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIHKY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTPOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIHKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTPOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTPOF is a better buy in the short-term than CIHKY.

Price Growth

CIHKY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.99% price change this week, while MTPOF (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIHKY($155B) has a higher market cap than MTPOF($5.6B). CIHKY has higher P/E ratio than MTPOF: CIHKY (8.08) vs MTPOF (6.98). CIHKY YTD gains are higher at: 30.783 vs. MTPOF (12.985). CIHKY has higher revenues than MTPOF: CIHKY (332B) vs MTPOF (151B).
CIHKYMTPOFCIHKY / MTPOF
Capitalization155B5.6B2,767%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.78312.985237%
P/E Ratio8.086.98116%
Revenue332B151B220%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A105B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIHKY vs MTPOF: Fundamental Ratings
CIHKY
MTPOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6448
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1578
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIHKY's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (57). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHKY (64). This means that MTPOF’s stock grew similarly to CIHKY’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHKY (1). This means that MTPOF’s stock grew similarly to CIHKY’s over the last 12 months.

CIHKY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (60). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

CIHKY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTPOF (78). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIHKYMTPOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIHKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMJIX44.78N/A
N/A
Calvert US Mid Cap Core Rspnb Idx I
JEVCX10.37N/A
N/A
JHancock Disciplined Value Em Mkts Eq C
CFIAX14.69N/A
N/A
Columbia Flexible Capital Income A
JWWCX121.00-0.75
-0.62%
Janus Henderson Global Research C
RWMFX65.45-0.49
-0.74%
American Funds Washington Mutual R5

CIHKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIHKY has been loosely correlated with HSNGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIHKY jumps, then HSNGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIHKY
1D Price
Change %
CIHKY100%
+1.10%
HSNGY - CIHKY
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
BHKLY - CIHKY
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
PSTVY - CIHKY
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
CIHHF - CIHKY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBOOY - CIHKY
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
More

MTPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTPOF has been loosely correlated with SBGOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTPOF jumps, then SBGOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTPOF
1D Price
Change %
MTPOF100%
-2.05%
SBGOF - MTPOF
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
CIHHF - MTPOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSNHF - MTPOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBNNF - MTPOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHKY - MTPOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More